HKG ยท Consumer Cyclical ยท Weekly analysis

0458Wave & cycle analysis

Tristate Holdings Limited

Latest close HKD 1.94 Week ending 2 Oct 2026 History 276 weeks
Current reading

The wave count points to a decline

The selected pattern describes a move downward. Compare it with trend, momentum and the price levels below before drawing a conclusion.

37/100 Setup score 100/100 Data quality Watching Setup status
A setup score is a measure of fit, not a probability or price forecast.
How to use this report

Start with price. Read the selected pattern and the weekly closing levels beside the chart. โ€œConfirmโ€ means a move supports that interpretation; it does not guarantee a return.

Compare the evidence. A wave count can disagree with the trend, momentum or sector. The report points out those differences before looking at timing.

Check the limits. Timing windows are estimates, the last swing can move, and historical outcomes vary. Open the rules and data notes for more detail.

01 ยท Price & key levels

The pattern and the prices to watch

Selected wave countPossible bearish Wave 2 crest

Numbers 1 to 5 label the successive legs of the selected wave pattern. The last point can still move.

Other readingsThe other readings point the other way

7 of 7 available readings lean against the downward wave interpretation; 0 support it. The pattern and current market behaviour do not yet agree.

Main uncertaintyLow count stability

The leading count changed 5 times across the last 9 checks. Keep the alternative interpretations in view.

Weekly price and wave pattern

Move across the chart to inspect a week. Turn on explanations for a guide to the marked points.

Weekly close30-week trendFair ValueConfirmationCount failureSelected pattern

The shaded area marks the selected pattern. Filled dots mark confirmed turns; the outlined dot is still forming. Prices use completed weeks; changing the chart range does not recalculate the count.

Weekly chart values
Prices in HKD ยท the history displayed on the chart
Week endingClose30-week trendFair Value
2023-10-131.740.89180.764
2023-10-201.740.92640.7701
2023-10-271.740.96180.7761
2023-11-031.740.9990.7821
2023-11-101.741.040.7882
2023-11-171.741.070.7942
2023-11-241.741.110.8003
2023-12-011.741.150.8063
2023-12-081.741.190.8124
2023-12-151.741.230.8184
2023-12-221.741.260.8247
2023-12-291.741.300.8305
2024-01-051.741.340.8363
2024-01-121.741.380.8418
2024-01-191.741.420.8469
2024-01-261.751.460.8522
2024-02-021.741.500.8572
2024-02-091.751.540.8623
2024-02-161.741.570.8674
2024-02-231.781.610.8736
2024-03-011.751.650.8796
2024-03-082.291.690.8892
2024-03-152.201.730.8984
2024-03-222.181.770.9075
2024-03-292.151.790.9165
2024-04-052.201.810.9258
2024-04-122.171.830.9347
2024-04-192.281.850.9444
2024-04-262.261.870.9539
2024-05-032.391.890.9643
2024-05-102.451.910.9751
2024-05-172.451.940.9858
2024-05-242.461.960.9965
2024-05-312.421.981.01
2024-06-072.332.001.02
2024-06-142.342.021.03
2024-06-212.392.051.04
2024-06-282.682.081.05
2024-07-052.652.111.06
2024-07-122.682.141.07
2024-07-192.722.171.09
2024-07-262.682.201.10
2024-08-022.682.231.11
2024-08-092.552.261.12
2024-08-162.352.281.13
2024-08-232.202.301.14
2024-08-302.072.311.15
2024-09-062.142.321.16
2024-09-132.152.341.17
2024-09-202.202.351.18
2024-09-272.242.371.19
2024-10-042.382.371.20
2024-10-112.362.371.21
2024-10-182.452.381.22
2024-10-252.402.391.23
2024-11-012.342.401.24
2024-11-082.342.401.25
2024-11-152.342.401.26
2024-11-222.342.411.27
2024-11-292.342.401.28
2024-12-062.332.401.29
2024-12-132.342.401.30
2024-12-202.352.391.31
2024-12-272.352.391.32
2025-01-032.322.391.33
2025-01-102.322.391.34
2025-01-172.322.391.35
2025-01-242.322.371.36
2025-01-312.322.361.37
2025-02-072.372.351.38
2025-02-142.372.341.40
2025-02-212.142.321.40
2025-02-282.142.311.41
2025-03-071.862.281.42
2025-03-141.912.271.43
2025-03-211.912.261.44
2025-03-282.002.261.45
2025-04-041.912.251.45
2025-04-111.912.241.46
2025-04-181.912.231.47
2025-04-251.912.221.47
2025-05-021.962.211.48
2025-05-092.132.201.49
2025-05-162.332.191.50
2025-05-232.332.191.51
2025-05-302.332.191.52
2025-06-062.332.191.53
2025-06-132.332.191.54
2025-06-202.312.191.55
2025-06-272.332.191.56
2025-07-042.332.191.57
2025-07-112.332.191.58
2025-07-182.402.191.59
2025-07-252.402.191.60
2025-08-012.402.201.62
2025-08-082.402.201.63
2025-08-152.402.201.64
2025-08-222.352.201.65
2025-08-292.252.201.66
2025-09-052.102.191.67
2025-09-122.102.181.68
2025-09-192.102.181.69
2025-09-262.102.181.70
2025-10-032.102.191.71
2025-10-101.782.181.71
2025-10-171.782.181.72
2025-10-241.782.171.73
2025-10-311.782.171.74
2025-11-071.782.161.75
2025-11-141.782.161.75
2025-11-211.782.151.76
2025-11-281.782.151.77
2025-12-051.782.141.78
2025-12-121.782.121.78
2025-12-191.782.101.79
2025-12-261.802.081.80
2026-01-021.802.061.81
2026-01-091.792.051.81
2026-01-161.792.031.82
2026-01-231.792.011.83
2026-01-301.791.991.83
2026-02-061.791.971.84
2026-02-131.791.951.85
2026-02-201.701.931.85
2026-02-271.701.911.86
2026-03-061.701.881.87
2026-03-131.701.861.87
2026-03-201.951.851.88
2026-03-271.901.841.89
2026-04-031.991.831.90
2026-04-102.051.831.91
2026-04-172.051.831.91
2026-04-241.871.821.92
2026-05-011.681.811.93
2026-05-081.681.801.94
2026-05-151.681.801.94
2026-05-221.691.801.95
2026-05-291.691.791.96
2026-06-051.771.791.97
2026-06-121.771.791.97
2026-06-191.751.791.98
2026-06-262.001.801.99
2026-07-032.001.812.00
2026-07-102.001.822.01
2026-07-172.001.822.02
2026-07-242.001.832.03
2026-07-311.771.832.03
2026-08-071.651.822.04
2026-08-141.501.812.04
2026-08-211.621.812.04
2026-08-281.601.802.05
2026-09-041.601.802.05
2026-09-111.641.792.05
2026-09-181.901.802.05
2026-09-251.941.812.05
2026-10-021.941.812.05
4-week return 21.6%
13-week return -2.7%
26-week return -2.3%
52-week return -7.4%
From 52-week high -31.8%
26-week volatility 44.4%
Scenario playbook

What would strengthenโ€”or changeโ€”the view?

Start with the price condition. Then check the supporting evidence and the alternative count.

Direction holds

Wait for price confirmation

Below HKD 1.50

The count needs a weekly close beyond this reference, with supporting price and cycle evidence.

No decision yet

Timing arrives; price does not turn

A projected window can pass without a reversal. Keep the count provisional if price has not confirmed; review the alternative count and the longer cycle.

Count fails

Know what changes the view

Above HKD 2.00

A weekly close beyond this boundary conflicts with the selected count. Review a fresh count instead of extending the old explanation.

Does the interpretation survive a different swing size?

3 of 3 available degrees share the leading direction. These are different views of the same price series.

Strategic ยท 8.0% reversalPossible bearish Wave 2 crest
63/100 pattern fit ยท agrees with leading direction
Primary ยท 5.0% reversalPossible bearish Wave 2 crest
63/100 pattern fit ยท agrees with leading direction
Tactical ยท 3.5% reversalPossible bearish Wave 2 crest
63/100 pattern fit ยท agrees with leading direction
02 ยท Wave count

How the wave count fits

The chart uses a 5.0% closing-price reversal threshold. Filled markers are confirmed pivots; the outlined final marker is still forming.

Scenario comparison

Compare the possible patterns

Possible bearish Wave 2 crestPrimary swing size ยท Leading33%
Possible bearish Wave 2 crestStrategic swing size33%
Possible bearish Wave 2 crestTactical swing size33%
Weights compare the displayed patterns; they are not probabilities. The same pattern can appear at different swing sizes.
Leading wave count

Possible bearish Wave 2 crest

33% evidence weight

The count below meets the required wave rules. The details show which swings and proportions support it. A valid pattern is still an interpretation of past price moves.

Confirm below 1.50 Fails above 2.00 Count stability Low ยท 20/100
Wave rules and proportions
PassWave 2 protects the Wave 1 originOrigin 2.00; Wave 2 1.94.
GuidelineWave 2 retracement is proportionateRetraced 89% of Wave 1.
Strategic degreePossible bearish Wave 2 crest

Strategic degree uses a 8.0% weekly closing-price reversal threshold.

Primary degreePossible bearish Wave 2 crest

Primary degree uses a 5.0% weekly closing-price reversal threshold.

Tactical degreePossible bearish Wave 2 crest

Tactical degree uses a 3.5% weekly closing-price reversal threshold.

Active swing 29.7%

7 weeks ยท Forming

Nearest confirmed support 1.50

Pivot from 2026-08-14

Nearest confirmed resistance 2.00

Pivot from 2026-07-24

30-week trend 1.81

Price is 7.2% from trend

Fair Value reference 2.05

Price is -5.1% from Fair Value

52-week range position 37%

1.41 low ยท 2.85 high

03 ยท Supporting evidence

Where the evidence agrees or disagrees

7 of 7 available readings lean against the downward wave interpretation; 0 support it. The pattern and current market behaviour do not yet agree.

100% directional agreement

The other readings point the other way. 0 readings support the selected direction; 7 lean against it.

Trend

Price is holding above its 30-week trend.

7.2% above trend
Cycle pressure

The medium-term pressure curve is turning higher.

Rising
Cycle alignment

Several cycle lengths are improving together.

Rising Stack
Relative strength

Outperforming its benchmark

+15.2
Market activity

Participation is supportive

+15.0
Market dynamics

Price and volume behaviour is supportive

+0.2
30-week momentum

Medium-term momentum is positive

+14.4
Balance of readings Constructive

7 constructive, 0 weak and 0 neutral measures.

Agreement describes direction among the readings. It does not necessarily support the selected wave count.

Market activity

Whether participation is supporting the move.

Participation is supportive. This challenges the downward wave view.

Relative strength

Performance against the market benchmark.

Outperforming its benchmark. This challenges the downward wave view.

30-week momentum

The pace of the medium-term price move.

Medium-term momentum is positive. This challenges the downward wave view.

Market dynamics

A separate scale prevents this lower-range measure being hidden by relative strength.

Price and volume behaviour is supportive. This challenges the downward wave view.

04 ยท Cycle timing

What cycle timing adds

Cycle estimates help describe timing. They do not set a date for the next price turn.

Possible turning intervals

The timing map.

Estimated from 2 Oct 2026. Bands show model uncertainty, not confidence intervals or guaranteed turning dates.

Trough window Crest window
Now+37 weeks
10w bandEstimated 9w ยท Rising
7/100Repeat fit ยท 30.7 cycles of history
Trough: 2 Octโ€“27 Nov 2026 (+0โ€“8w)Crest: 9 Octโ€“18 Dec 2026 (+1โ€“11w)
20w bandEstimated 25w ยท Rising
11/100Repeat fit ยท 11.0 cycles of history
Trough: 29 Janโ€“9 Apr 2027 (+17โ€“27w)Crest: 11 Decโ€“19 Feb 2027 (+10โ€“20w)
40w bandEstimated 30w ยท Rising
25/100Repeat fit ยท 9.2 cycles of history
Trough: 29 Janโ€“18 Jun 2027 (+17โ€“37w)Crest: 11 Decโ€“30 Apr 2027 (+10โ€“30w)
80w bandEstimated 60w ยท Troughing
No measurable positive repeat
0/100Repeat fit ยท 4.6 cycles of history

The best nearby repeat is selected from the same sample being described. Its fit is not an out-of-sample forecast score. When fewer than two estimated cycles are available the recent weekly history has gaps, or no positive repeat is measured, timing windows are withheld.

Cycle pressure is rising. That supports the recent upswing, but it does not establish how long it will last.

Cycle repeat scores range from 0 to 25/100. Low scores mean the past rhythm is irregular, so the projected weeks deserve less weight.

Pressure phaseRising

Current medium-term pressure direction

Cycle agreementRising Stack

100/100 rising alignment ยท 0/100 falling alignment

Estimated next low22 weeks

Timing estimate, not a dated forecast

Estimated next high15 weeks

Timing estimate, not a dated forecast

Cycle pressure

Above zero is positive pressure; direction matters more than the absolute number.

Shorter and longer cycles

The thick line is the blended reading; thinner lines show 20, 40 and 80-week components.

An observed cycle is the repeat found in past prices. The repeat score describes how clearly it appears. FLD is a shifted price reference used to check a turn. Low timing scores can coexist with a positive price-cross check.

Typical / observed cycle10w / 9w
Current phaseRising
Repeat score7/100
Price-cross check (FLD)Crossed Up
Since last trough6w
Possible next low0โ€“8w
Typical / observed cycle20w / 25w
Current phaseRising
Repeat score11/100
Price-cross check (FLD)Crossed Down
Since last trough3w
Possible next low17โ€“27w
Typical / observed cycle40w / 30w
Current phaseRising
Repeat score25/100
Price-cross check (FLD)Crossed Up
Since last trough3w
Possible next low17โ€“37w
Typical / observed cycle80w / 60w
Current phaseTroughing
Repeat score0/100
Price-cross check (FLD)Crossed Up
Since last trough29w
Possible next low-
05 ยท Risk

Risk behind the price move

Wave structure is easier to judge when drawdown, volatility and participation are visible beside it.

Risk in context

How much room price has to move

Price is 28.6% below the highest weekly close in the stored history. It is 31.8% below the 52-week high. The two figures use different reference points.

Largest contributors to the risk score

  • Count instability

    The primary interpretation has low recent stability.

  • Trend extension

    Price is 7.2% above the 30-week trend; large positive gaps increase snap-back vulnerability.

Downside risk check

Contained

10/100
Wave maturity0/25
Trend extension2/20
Range position0/15
Cycle rollover0/15
Multi-cycle risk0/15
Count instability8/10
Event proximity0/10

This score combines the risk checks shown here. A higher score means more warning signs, not a measured probability of a fall.

52-week low1.41
52-week high2.85
Annualised volatility44.4%

Based on the latest 26 weekly returns

Average weekly range2.9%

Average high-to-low range over 13 weeks

Current drawdown-28.6%

From the highest close in the stored record

Latest volume148%

Of its trailing 20-week average

Drawdown history

Distance below the highest prior weekly close.

Realised volatility

Annualised variability of the latest 26 weekly returns.

Relative volume

Weekly volume as a percentage of its 20-week average.

06 ยท Market context

Sector trends and upcoming events

Compare the pattern with other stocks in the sector, then check whether an event could change the price picture.

Sector breadth

Most analysed peers have an upward wave count. That contrasts with this reportโ€™s downward interpretation.

55% constructive

12 of 22 analysed peers have a leading upward wave pattern.

5% have improving cycles Breadth shows whether peers share the structure. Cohort outcomes use non-overlapping, point-in-time trend and momentum states from the same sector and report benchmark excess return when matching benchmark bars exist; they are context, not a backtest of the Elliott count.
Earnings and options

Event information is limited

No additional warning is recorded. Missing event data does not rule out a surprise.

These are the latest stored event readings. Missing earnings or options data does not mean that event risk is absent.
Peer-state horizonNon-overlapping samplesPositiveMedianMedian excess vs ^HSIMiddle 80% of returns
4 weeks14947%-0.3%-2.1%-10.8% to 14.7%
13 weeks9051%1.2%-3.9%-18.4% to 29.9%
26 weeks7353%2.8%-0.5%-19.9% to 39.4%
07 ยท History

What happened after similar readings

After similar readings, the middle 4-week return was +0.0% across 62 completed outcomes. The range below shows how far individual outcomes differed. Overlapping weeks are not independent tests of this wave count.

62 similar weekly states

Typical return after a match

Median outcome after each matching historical week.

4w
0.0%
13w
-6.0%
26w
0.0%
HorizonMatchesPositiveMedianRange
4 weeks 62 34% 0.0% -25.0% to 59.2%
13 weeks 58 36% -6.0% -28.0% to 65.6%
26 weeks 57 49% 0.0% -27.7% to 115.6%

Overlapping historical matches are descriptive context, not independent observations or a forecast.

Data quality, rules and limitations
Evidence quality100/100

This measures usable history, indicator coverage and confirmed swing points. It does not measure the chance of the scenario succeeding.

Weekly history
100/100
Indicator coverage
100/100
Confirmed structure
100/100

Elliott impulse rules โ†— ยท Hurst price confirmation โ†—

Model ewc-2.2.0 ยท as of 2026-10-02 ยท the last swing is provisional; adaptive thresholds and cycle periods can revise earlier labels between reports.
How the count is built

Rules and data notes

  • Swing points use weekly closes and a 5.0% adaptive reversal threshold.
  • The final swing is provisional until the reversal threshold is met.
  • Candidate counts must pass the Wave 2 origin, Wave 3 progression/length and Wave 4 overlap rules when those waves are present.
  • Fibonacci proportions and alternation rank valid candidates but never rescue a hard-rule failure.
  • Primary and alternate evidence weights compare admissible counts; they are not probabilities.
  • These close-based impulse and A/B/C candidates do not exhaustively classify diagonals, triangles or complex corrections. Counts and historical cycle curves can be revised when adaptive thresholds or estimated periods change.
  • Nominal Hurst periods adapt to observed weekly rhythm. Future windows include measured timing uncertainty and require FLD or price confirmation.
Audit trail

Recent swing points

Dates and prices for the recent swings. The final point can still move. This is the current reconstruction; it is not a saved history of earlier published labels.

DateStatusTypePriceMoveDuration
2024-06-07 Confirmed Low 2.33 -5.2% 2 weeks
2024-07-19 Confirmed High 2.72 16.9% 6 weeks
2024-08-30 Confirmed Low 2.07 -24.0% 6 weeks
2024-10-18 Confirmed High 2.45 18.4% 7 weeks
2025-03-07 Confirmed Low 1.86 -24.0% 20 weeks
2025-08-15 Confirmed High 2.40 28.8% 23 weeks
2026-03-13 Confirmed Low 1.70 -29.2% 30 weeks
2026-04-17 Confirmed High 2.05 20.6% 5 weeks
2026-05-15 Confirmed Low 1.68 -17.9% 4 weeks
2026-07-24 Confirmed High 2.00 18.8% 10 weeks
2026-08-14 Confirmed Low 1.50 -25.0% 3 weeks
2026-10-02 Forming High 1.94 29.7% 7 weeks
Follow the evidence

Test the view in related research.

Compare the same market from another angle. Shared price inputs can agree without providing independent confirmation.

Chart guide

Evidence context