Top current results
Price Strength Relative to Volatility Stock Screen. This page compares published weekly company figures for valuation, financial strength, price performance, income and risk, with links to the supporting company records and data.
Structured data for this page is available at https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/strategies/risk-adj-momentum/Factor approach · week ending 9 Aug 2026
Price Strength Relative to Volatility
Twelve-to-one-month price performance divided by one-year volatility.
Current result
What this screen found
The list applies one stated set of rules to the completed weekly market data. It is a research shortlist, not a portfolio.
Where the list is concentrated
Sector mix
Current qualifying list
How the companies compare
The axes use the two measures most relevant to this screen. Larger green circles have the stronger combined factor score; labels mark the leading results. Select a company to open its report.
Circle size and colour show the combined factor score.
Current qualifying list
Price Strength Relative to Volatility companies
Ranks run from 0 to 100. A higher rank is stronger on value, financial strength or price performance.
Full comparison table
| Rank | Company | Sector | Combined | Value | Financial strength | Price performance | P/E | ROE | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MTE Micron Technology, Inc. | Technology | 73.0/100 | 21.0/100 | 95.0/100 | 99.0/100 | 17.0× | 50.1% | 75.8% |
| 2 | INL Intel Corporation | Technology | 10.0/100 | 4.0/100 | 12.0/100 | 99.0/100 | — | -2.8% | 69.8% |
| 3 | AP2 Applied Materials, Inc. | Technology | 44.0/100 | 1.0/100 | 86.0/100 | 98.0/100 | 43.5× | 35.6% | 44.1% |
| 4 | NOA3 Nokia Oyj | Technology | 21.0/100 | 14.0/100 | 25.0/100 | 96.0/100 | 57.2× | 3.8% | 46.0% |
| 5 | ASME ASML Holding N.V. | Technology | 52.0/100 | 1.0/100 | 96.0/100 | 97.0/100 | 57.5× | 48.1% | 37.4% |
| 6 | CAT1 Caterpillar Inc. | Industrials | 36.0/100 | 3.0/100 | 78.0/100 | 94.0/100 | 35.6× | 50.5% | 32.7% |
| 7 | SNG Singulus Technologies AG | Industrials | 43.0/100 | 46.0/100 | 46.0/100 | 47.0/100 | — | 27.5% | 107.1% |
| 8 | WDC WESTERN DIGITAL CORP. R | Technology | 51.0/100 | 6.0/100 | 84.0/100 | 99.0/100 | 20.0× | 67.0% | 201.1% |
| 9 | SGM STMicroelectronics N.V. | Technology | 13.0/100 | 8.0/100 | 16.0/100 | 96.0/100 | 183.9× | 1.3% | 48.7% |
| 10 | AIXA AIXTRON SE | Technology | 41.0/100 | 6.0/100 | 74.0/100 | 97.0/100 | 53.1× | 9.6% | 58.4% |
| 11 | ADV Adtran Networks SE | Technology | 14.0/100 | 24.0/100 | 21.0/100 | 63.0/100 | — | -6.3% | 3.9% |
| 12 | GLW Corning Incorporated | Technology | 29.0/100 | 2.0/100 | 64.0/100 | 97.0/100 | 68.7× | 15.3% | 56.0% |
| 13 | AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Technology | 34.0/100 | 0.0/100 | 77.0/100 | 97.0/100 | 136.2× | 7.8% | 66.7% |
| 14 | ALI1 Almonty Industries Inc. | Basic Materials | 18.0/100 | 19.0/100 | 5.0/100 | 98.0/100 | — | -37.1% | 90.0% |
| 15 | KLA KLA Corporation | Technology | 48.0/100 | 1.0/100 | 95.0/100 | 95.0/100 | 48.0× | 80.1% | 47.9% |
| 16 | FDX FedEx Corporation | Industrials | 82.0/100 | 73.0/100 | 28.0/100 | 90.0/100 | 14.6× | 14.0% | 24.5% |
| 17 | VBK Verbio SE | Basic Materials | 25.0/100 | 28.0/100 | 4.0/100 | 97.0/100 | — | -9.8% | 59.9% |
| 18 | V1L Valero Energy Corporation | Energy | 80.0/100 | 64.0/100 | 32.0/100 | 95.0/100 | 17.8× | 17.6% | 42.5% |
| 19 | ERCB Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Technology | 99.0/100 | 99.0/100 | 73.0/100 | 93.0/100 | 1.1× | 24.6% | 44.0% |
| 20 | HOT HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft | Industrials | 30.0/100 | 17.0/100 | 38.0/100 | 95.0/100 | 42.3× | 52.2% | 42.1% |
| 21 | ARRD ArcelorMittal S.A. | Basic Materials | 63.0/100 | 57.0/100 | 6.0/100 | 94.0/100 | 16.3× | 5.3% | 36.3% |
| 22 | HBC1 HSBC Holdings plc | Financial Services | 81.0/100 | 66.0/100 | 40.0/100 | 89.0/100 | 13.8× | 11.3% | 24.2% |
| 23 | VIA Viatris Inc. | Healthcare | 47.0/100 | 41.0/100 | 18.0/100 | 91.0/100 | — | -2.0% | 29.8% |
| 24 | LLY Eli Lilly and Company | Healthcare | 45.0/100 | 2.0/100 | 93.0/100 | 91.0/100 | 35.9× | 81.0% | 33.4% |
| 25 | SMHN SUSS MicroTec SE | Technology | 12.0/100 | 5.0/100 | 18.0/100 | 96.0/100 | 47.3× | 10.5% | 63.0% |
| 26 | DWD Morgan Stanley | Financial Services | 28.0/100 | 30.0/100 | 17.0/100 | 85.0/100 | 16.1× | 15.8% | 22.5% |
| 27 | JEN Jenoptik AG | Technology | 38.0/100 | 28.0/100 | 31.0/100 | 94.0/100 | 28.2× | 7.8% | 43.9% |
| 28 | RWL Rockwell Automation, Inc. | Industrials | 48.0/100 | 5.0/100 | 90.0/100 | 92.0/100 | 39.1× | 30.9% | 42.3% |
| 29 | TEY TERADYNE INC. R | Technology | 37.0/100 | 1.0/100 | 79.0/100 | 98.0/100 | 61.0× | 27.2% | 89.4% |
| 30 | ERCG Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Technology | 99.0/100 | 99.0/100 | 74.0/100 | 93.0/100 | 1.2× | 24.6% | 46.8% |
| 31 | AVS ASM International NV | Technology | 44.0/100 | 2.0/100 | 89.0/100 | 94.0/100 | 72.4× | 13.5% | 45.2% |
| 32 | TNIE tonies SE | Consumer Cyclical | 12.0/100 | 4.0/100 | 23.0/100 | 93.0/100 | 111.9× | 3.7% | 43.7% |
| 33 | RAW Raiffeisen Bank International AG | Financial Services | 95.0/100 | 79.0/100 | 63.0/100 | 93.0/100 | 15.0× | 6.3% | 34.9% |
| 34 | RIO1 Rio Tinto Group | Basic Materials | 87.0/100 | 66.0/100 | 57.0/100 | 88.0/100 | 14.3× | 16.0% | 22.2% |
| 35 | BWB Baader Bank Aktiengesellschaft | Financial Services | 70.0/100 | 63.0/100 | 19.0/100 | 80.0/100 | 6.5× | 21.7% | 16.7% |
| 36 | TQI Telecom Italia S.p.A. A | Communication Services | 47.0/100 | 34.0/100 | 25.0/100 | 98.0/100 | 54.1× | 2.5% | 92.9% |
| 37 | ABEC Alphabet Inc. | Communication Services | 50.0/100 | 8.0/100 | 87.0/100 | 90.0/100 | 23.5× | 33.5% | 31.0% |
| 38 | ABEA Alphabet Inc. | Communication Services | 50.0/100 | 7.0/100 | 88.0/100 | 91.0/100 | 23.6× | 33.5% | 31.8% |
| 39 | ENA Endesa, S.A. | Utilities | 71.0/100 | 32.0/100 | 78.0/100 | 87.0/100 | 19.7× | 25.6% | 20.9% |
| 40 | LAR0 Lam Research Corp. R | Technology | 51.0/100 | 1.0/100 | 95.0/100 | 98.0/100 | 50.1× | 63.4% | 110.1% |
| 41 | JNJ Johnson & Johnson | Healthcare | 46.0/100 | 12.0/100 | 80.0/100 | 85.0/100 | 25.4× | 25.9% | 23.7% |
| 42 | ABJ ABB LTD. N | Industrials | 39.0/100 | 5.0/100 | 84.0/100 | 87.0/100 | 32.7× | 32.8% | 26.0% |
| 43 | REP Repsol, S.A. | Energy | 86.0/100 | 80.0/100 | 24.0/100 | 91.0/100 | 14.5× | 7.3% | 33.4% |
| 44 | OYC Delta Air Lines Inc. R | Industrials | 94.0/100 | 73.0/100 | 62.0/100 | 97.0/100 | 11.6× | 22.0% | 75.3% |
| 45 | IFX Infineon Technologies AG | Technology | 12.0/100 | 5.0/100 | 23.0/100 | 91.0/100 | 73.7× | 6.3% | 45.8% |
| 46 | HMSB H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) | Consumer Cyclical | 99.0/100 | 99.0/100 | 94.0/100 | 94.0/100 | 2.1× | 36.2% | 45.7% |
| 47 | J5A Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. | Communication Services | 61.0/100 | 29.0/100 | 56.0/100 | 96.0/100 | — | -5.3% | 63.6% |
| 48 | GOS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | Financial Services | 27.0/100 | 32.0/100 | 14.0/100 | 84.0/100 | 14.5× | 14.7% | 23.8% |
| 49 | CVS CVS Health Corporation | Healthcare | 76.0/100 | 64.0/100 | 26.0/100 | 86.0/100 | 36.0× | 3.8% | 31.5% |
| 50 | BAYN Bayer Aktiengesellschaft | Healthcare | 89.0/100 | 63.0/100 | 68.0/100 | 91.0/100 | — | -7.5% | 43.5% |
List against market
How the qualifiers differ
The comparison uses the same completed week and selected market. It shows the result of the screen rather than a claim about future returns.
Median relative ranks
Qualifying list and full market
Volatility distribution
Company size
Stored weekly prices
Historical record
Past results are hypothetical, before trading costs and based on the stated weekly selection rules. They do not show what an investor would necessarily have received.
Compounded weekly results
Growth of 100
Calendar years
Return by year
Calendar months
Monthly return record
Selection rules
What the screen does
Open a company page to see its exact inputs and every other approach it currently passes.
Twelve-to-one-month price performance divided by one-year volatility.
Dividing the completed price return by volatility reduces the rank of companies whose return came with larger price variation.
1 · Market
Start with the selected market
The screen uses published weekly company records from the market shown at the top of the page.
2 · Rules
Apply the same tests to every company
The named measures, thresholds and sorting order are fixed for the screen.
3 · Check
Open the supporting figures
A passing result still needs company, sector, liquidity, accounting and risk research.
Limits of the comparison
Scores are relative to the selected market and can change when the market or its data changes. Accounting dates differ. Historical figures may be revised. A screen can remain out of favour for long periods.
Historical results exclude spreads, commissions, market impact, taxes and capacity limits. They are research evidence, not a forecast, recommendation or personal portfolio.