Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/4fa5bc22-f3d5-4125-a45f-e47aaabf7234/
RWL
Rockwell Automation, Inc.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
2.9%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
5.0%ile
P/E
39.9×
P/S
4.9×
P/B
12.3×
E/P
0.0250
FCF Yield
0.028
EBITDA/EV
0.035
SH Yield
0.029
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
96.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
92.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
93.00000000
/100
P/E of 39.9x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 92.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
89.0%ile
ROE
0.309
ROA
0.097
Net Margin
0.124
Op Margin
0.190
GPA
0.411
Current
1.09
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.009
Earn Growth
-0.083
Stability
0.303
lower=better
Accruals
-0.040
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 31% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
46.0%ile
6M Return
19.2%
Vol 252d
49.8%
Vol 60d
32.9%
↓ Contracting
Max DD 12M
-14.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Volatility is compressing — 60d (33%) well below 252d (50%).
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.19
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 143 peers
Sector Value %ile
5.6%
Sector Quality %ile
95.1%
P/E z-score
-0.10
P/B z-score
1.23
Sector Avg OS
50.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Quality at a Premium
High quality (89th) but expensive (5th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Compressing
60-day vol (33%) well below 252-day (50%). Price action is stabilising.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
29.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
63.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
B
61.5% avg (1 factors)
Risk
D
33.6% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.190 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.050 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.890 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.460 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.879 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.498 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
39.92
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0250
Price / Sales
4.94
Price / Book
12.34
Price / Cash Flow
28.32
FCF Yield
2.8%
EBITDA / EV
3.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1869
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
2.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
30.9%
Return on Assets
9.7%
Net Margin
12.4%
Operating Margin
19.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
41.1%
Current Ratio
1.09
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.040
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.081
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
19.2%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
0.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-8.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.303
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
1.4%
Buyback Yield
1.5%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
96
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
92
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
93
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity