Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/1bb80c33-9dda-434b-b5f4-3fe535bcea28/
LAXMIINDIA
LAXMI INDIA FINANCE LTDSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
72.0%ile
P/E
10.2×
P/S
1.7×
P/B
1.2×
E/P
0.0978
FCF Yield
-0.155
EBITDA/EV
0.047
SH Yield
-0.296
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
26.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
38.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
37.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.2x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-15.5%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
8.0%ile
ROE
0.117
ROA
0.030
Net Margin
0.170
Op Margin
0.264
GPA
0.063
Current
502.57
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.285
Earn Growth
0.382
Stability
0.458
lower=better
Accruals
0.184
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 0.184 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
50.0%ile
6M Return
-20.5%
Vol 252d
68.3%
Vol 60d
130.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-53.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (130%) is expanding vs long-term (68%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.54
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 237 peers
Sector Value %ile
70.6%
Sector Quality %ile
17.2%
P/E z-score
-0.39
P/B z-score
-0.10
Sector Avg OS
48.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCBBANK | 99.0% | 94.0% | 87.0% | 86.0% | |
| INDIANB | 98.0% | 89.0% | 76.0% | 90.0% | |
| JPOLYINVST | 98.0% | 84.0% | 93.0% | 89.0% | |
| SOUTHBANK | 98.0% | 92.0% | 67.0% | 93.0% | |
| CANBK | 97.0% | 90.0% | 67.0% | 85.0% | |
| BANKBARODA | 97.0% | 94.0% | 70.0% | 76.0% | |
| DHANBANK | 97.0% | 93.0% | 76.0% | 74.0% | |
| SURYODAY | 96.0% | 89.0% | 68.0% | 84.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (72th value) but weak quality (8th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 29% with P/E of 10×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (130%) significantly exceeds 252-day (68%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
51.1% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
46.3% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
11.8% avg (1 factors)
Risk
F
2.9% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.540 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.720 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.080 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.500 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.848 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.683 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.22
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0978
Price / Sales
1.74
Price / Book
1.20
FCF Yield
-15.5%
EBITDA / EV
4.7%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1728
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-29.6%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
11.7%
Return on Assets
3.0%
Net Margin
17.0%
Operating Margin
26.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
6.3%
Current Ratio
502.57
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.184
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-20.5%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
28.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
38.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.458
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-29.6%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
26
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
38
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
37
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity