Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/263ca706-0ad0-4e61-a580-f8ff8c88a2d7/
BEDMUTHA
Bedmutha Industries LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
8.8%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
81.0%ile
P/S
0.3×
P/B
2.5×
FCF Yield
0.093
EBITDA/EV
0.088
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
15.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
16.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
18.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 9.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
37.0%ile
ROE
-0.042
ROA
-0.010
Net Margin
-0.005
Op Margin
0.018
GPA
0.159
Current
1.45
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.293
Earn Growth
0.185
Stability
3.701
lower=better
Accruals
-0.184
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
11.0%ile
6M Return
9.5%
12M Return
-31.5%
12-1 Mom
-31.4%
Risk-Adj
-0.78
Vol 252d
40.3%
Vol 60d
100.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-36.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -31% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (100%) is expanding vs long-term (40%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.58
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
73.7%
Sector Quality %ile
45.3%
P/B z-score
-0.16
Sector Avg OS
54.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% |
Factor Interactions
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (81th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (11th) despite looking cheap (81th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (100%) significantly exceeds 252-day (40%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
61.8% avg (5 factors)
Quality
F
29.2% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
13.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
49.6% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.580 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.810 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.370 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.110 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.786 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.403 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Sales
0.27
Price / Book
2.54
Price / Cash Flow
3.29
FCF Yield
9.3%
EBITDA / EV
8.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
2.2798
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-4.2%
Return on Assets
-1.0%
Net Margin
-0.5%
Operating Margin
1.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
15.9%
Current Ratio
1.45
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.184
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
9.5%
12M Return
-31.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-31.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.78
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
29.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
18.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
3.701
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
15
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
16
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
18
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity