Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/2e723553-d126-4701-83e5-8c52f0432a43/
ALIVUS
Alivus Life Sciences LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
37.0%ile
P/E
22.0×
P/S
4.8×
P/B
3.8×
E/P
0.0455
FCF Yield
0.020
EBITDA/EV
0.067
SH Yield
0.004
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
69.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
64.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
66.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
94.0%ile
ROE
0.173
ROA
0.145
Net Margin
0.221
Op Margin
0.285
GPA
0.380
Current
5.21
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.069
Earn Growth
0.160
Stability
0.107
lower=better
Accruals
0.003
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
76.0%ile
6M Return
16.8%
12M Return
3.2%
12-1 Mom
12.0%
Risk-Adj
0.46
Vol 252d
26.3%
Vol 60d
60.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-16.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (61%) is expanding vs long-term (26%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.78
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Healthcare
· 160 peers
Sector Value %ile
64.0%
Sector Quality %ile
90.1%
P/E z-score
-0.22
P/B z-score
-0.36
Sector Avg OS
43.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATCOPHARM | 98.0% | 88.0% | 87.0% | 81.0% | |
| LINCOLN | 97.0% | 88.0% | 80.0% | 81.0% | |
| UNIVPHOTO | 97.0% | 86.0% | 74.0% | 94.0% | |
| STAR | 96.0% | 73.0% | 91.0% | 91.0% | |
| VENUSREM | 96.0% | 68.0% | 94.0% | 99.0% | |
| HALEOSLABS | 95.0% | 82.0% | 77.0% | 81.0% | |
| AUROPHARMA | 94.0% | 71.0% | 84.0% | 87.0% | |
| SAGILITY | 93.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | 76.0% |
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (94th) and momentum (76th) but expensive (37th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (61%) significantly exceeds 252-day (26%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
42.2% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
77.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
C
45.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
72.8% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.780 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.370 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.940 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.760 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.263 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
21.99
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0455
Price / Sales
4.85
Price / Book
3.80
Price / Cash Flow
22.41
FCF Yield
2.0%
EBITDA / EV
6.7%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2053
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
17.3%
Return on Assets
14.5%
Net Margin
22.1%
Operating Margin
28.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
38.0%
Current Ratio
5.21
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.003
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
16.8%
12M Return
3.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
12.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.46
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
6.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
16.0%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.107
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.5%
Buyback Yield
-0.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
69
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
64
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
66
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity