Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/421cff76-9d2c-4bbe-986c-b105193a36ba/
SOLARINDS
Solar Industries India LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
0.0%ile
P/E
99.5×
P/S
17.0×
P/B
26.6×
E/P
0.0101
FCF Yield
-0.007
EBITDA/EV
0.016
SH Yield
0.001
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
100.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
99.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
99.00000000
/100
P/E of 99.5x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. Negative FCF yield (-0.7%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 99.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
75.0%ile
ROE
0.267
ROA
0.154
Net Margin
0.171
Op Margin
0.241
GPA
0.457
Current
2.06
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.305
Earn Growth
0.387
Stability
0.240
lower=better
Accruals
0.097
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 27% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.097 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
75.0%ile
6M Return
43.9%
12M Return
11.7%
12-1 Mom
-2.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.08
Vol 252d
32.5%
Vol 60d
71.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-31.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (72%) is expanding vs long-term (32%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.22
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
0.8%
Sector Quality %ile
79.1%
P/E z-score
0.06
P/B z-score
6.16
Sector Avg OS
54.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% |
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (75th) and momentum (75th) but expensive (0th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (27%) but high accruals (0.097) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (75th) but expensive (0th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (72%) significantly exceeds 252-day (32%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
5.2% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
69.3% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
C
47.9% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
62.6% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.220 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.000 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.750 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.750 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.325 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
99.47
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0101
Price / Sales
16.96
Price / Book
26.58
Price / Cash Flow
268.77
FCF Yield
-0.7%
EBITDA / EV
1.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0585
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
26.7%
Return on Assets
15.4%
Net Margin
17.1%
Operating Margin
24.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
45.7%
Current Ratio
2.06
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.097
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
43.9%
12M Return
11.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-2.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.08
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
30.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
38.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.240
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.1%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
100
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
99
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
99
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity