Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/44443fc2-d5d3-45e8-b0ac-6d8496c2b7d8/
MNO
Meridian Mining PlcSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
50.0%ile
P/B
599.6×
FCF Yield
0.000
SH Yield
-0.002
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
50.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
51.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
51.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-0.0%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
48.0%ile
ROE
-0.262
ROA
-0.254
GPA
-0.003
Current
32.25
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Stability
0.276
lower=better
Accruals
-0.031
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
49.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-10.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.51
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 170 peers
Sector Value %ile
45.0%
Sector Quality %ile
41.5%
P/B z-score
0.02
Sector Avg OS
54.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
7.7% avg (3 factors)
Quality
D
34.4% avg (5 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.510 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.500 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.480 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.490 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 3.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.485 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Book
599.64
FCF Yield
-0.0%
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-0.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-26.2%
Return on Assets
-25.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
-0.3%
Current Ratio
32.25
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.031
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.276
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-0.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
50
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
51
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
51
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity