Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/482263f8-5522-4776-87ed-11bdb891b477/
HILINFRA
HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE LSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.6
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
11.8%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
82.0%ile
P/E
10.6×
P/S
0.6×
P/B
1.5×
E/P
0.0946
FCF Yield
-0.170
EBITDA/EV
0.118
SH Yield
-0.288
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
11.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
21.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
21.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-17.0%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
8.0%ile
ROE
0.140
ROA
0.085
Net Margin
0.053
Op Margin
0.039
GPA
0.137
Current
2.09
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.227
Earn Growth
0.630
Stability
0.243
lower=better
Accruals
0.261
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Accruals ratio of 0.261 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
53.0%ile
6M Return
-25.2%
Vol 252d
38.7%
Vol 60d
78.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-63.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (79%) is expanding vs long-term (39%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.67
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
85.1%
Sector Quality %ile
8.7%
P/E z-score
-0.44
P/B z-score
-0.28
Sector Avg OS
44.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (82th value) but weak quality (8th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 23% with P/E of 11×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (79%) significantly exceeds 252-day (39%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
56.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
33.3% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
5.9% avg (1 factors)
Risk
C
52.1% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.670 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.820 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.080 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.530 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.848 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.387 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.58
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0946
Price / Sales
0.56
Price / Book
1.49
FCF Yield
-17.0%
EBITDA / EV
11.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.3923
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-28.8%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
14.0%
Return on Assets
8.5%
Net Margin
5.3%
Operating Margin
3.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
13.7%
Current Ratio
2.09
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.261
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-25.2%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
22.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
63.0%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.243
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-28.8%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
11
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
21
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
21
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity