Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/52f9d19f-9de3-4f3f-8b37-988e0b2756d6/
HARIOMPIPE
Hariom Pipe Industries LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
5 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.940
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.807
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
13.0%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +23%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
88.0%ile
P/E
17.3×
P/S
0.8×
P/B
2.0×
E/P
0.0579
FCF Yield
0.019
EBITDA/EV
0.130
SH Yield
-0.001
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
10.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
16.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
17.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
74.0%ile
ROE
0.117
ROA
0.062
Net Margin
0.045
Op Margin
0.086
GPA
0.299
Current
1.68
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.228
Earn Growth
0.227
Stability
0.446
lower=better
Accruals
-0.095
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
63.0%ile
6M Return
19.5%
12M Return
-0.3%
12-1 Mom
-19.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.40
Vol 252d
48.7%
Vol 60d
116.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-48.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -20% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (116%) is expanding vs long-term (49%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.94
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
84.8%
Sector Quality %ile
78.6%
P/E z-score
-0.16
P/B z-score
-0.29
Sector Avg OS
54.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (88th) and quality (74th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 23% with P/E of 17×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (116%) significantly exceeds 252-day (49%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
55.9% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
48.6% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
29.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
35.5% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.940 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.880 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.740 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.630 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.487 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
17.28
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0579
Price / Sales
0.78
Price / Book
2.02
Price / Cash Flow
6.81
FCF Yield
1.9%
EBITDA / EV
13.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.9752
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-0.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
11.7%
Return on Assets
6.2%
Net Margin
4.5%
Operating Margin
8.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
29.9%
Current Ratio
1.68
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.095
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
19.5%
12M Return
-0.3%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-19.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.40
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
22.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
22.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.446
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
0.1%
Buyback Yield
-0.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
10
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
16
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
17
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity