Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/611186af-d110-44e5-a78b-8679abf948f9/
CCCL
Consolidated Construction Consortium LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 4.8
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
20.3%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
81.0%ile
P/E
4.8×
P/S
2.4×
P/B
2.4×
E/P
0.2066
FCF Yield
-0.160
EBITDA/EV
0.203
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
17.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
20.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
21.00000000
/100
P/E of 4.8x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-16.0%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
12.0%ile
ROE
0.486
ROA
0.273
Net Margin
0.495
Op Margin
-0.144
GPA
0.092
Current
1.62
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.619
Earn Growth
-0.275
Stability
1.606
lower=better
Accruals
0.471
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 49% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.471 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
23.0%ile
6M Return
-21.2%
12M Return
-21.1%
12-1 Mom
-14.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.28
Vol 252d
52.3%
Vol 60d
118.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-47.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -15% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (118%) is expanding vs long-term (52%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.51
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
84.2%
Sector Quality %ile
12.6%
P/E z-score
-0.51
P/B z-score
-0.22
Sector Avg OS
44.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (81th value) but weak quality (12th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 62% with P/E of 5×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (49%) but high accruals (0.471) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (118%) significantly exceeds 252-day (52%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
67.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
51.9% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
13.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
29.5% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.510 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.810 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.120 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.230 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.909 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.523 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
4.84
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.2066
Price / Sales
2.40
Price / Book
2.35
FCF Yield
-16.0%
EBITDA / EV
20.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.4268
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
48.6%
Return on Assets
27.3%
Net Margin
49.5%
Operating Margin
-14.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
9.2%
Current Ratio
1.62
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.471
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-21.2%
12M Return
-21.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-14.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.28
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
61.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-27.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.606
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
17
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
20
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
21
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity