Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/6241f638-3d10-4922-b3e9-9690805dba8a/
VISACHROME
VISA Chrome LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.860
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
109.9%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
90.0%ile
P/E
0.6×
P/S
1.1×
E/P
1.6922
FCF Yield
0.011
EBITDA/EV
1.099
SH Yield
-0.087
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
12.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
21.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
8.00000000
/100
P/E of 0.6x places this firmly in deep value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
4.0%ile
ROE
-4.776
ROA
1.962
Net Margin
1.866
Op Margin
-0.020
GPA
0.349
Current
0.10
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.008
Stability
5.165
lower=better
Accruals
1.895
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 1.895 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
94.0%ile
6M Return
-9.2%
12M Return
52.9%
12-1 Mom
61.0%
Risk-Adj
0.90
Vol 252d
67.7%
Vol 60d
154.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-55.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 61% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (155%) is expanding vs long-term (68%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.86
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
87.3%
Sector Quality %ile
3.8%
P/E z-score
-0.20
Sector Avg OS
54.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% |
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (90th value) with strong momentum (94th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (90th value) but weak quality (4th). Classic value trap risk.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (94th) but high volatility (68%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (155%) significantly exceeds 252-day (68%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
69.4% avg (6 factors)
Quality
D
39.8% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
B
66.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
3.8% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.900 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.040 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.940 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.848 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.677 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
0.59
Earnings Yield (E/P)
1.6922
Price / Sales
1.10
Price / Cash Flow
17.18
FCF Yield
1.1%
EBITDA / EV
109.9%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.5574
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-8.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-477.6%
Return on Assets
196.2%
Net Margin
186.6%
Operating Margin
-2.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
34.9%
Current Ratio
0.10
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
1.895
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-9.2%
12M Return
52.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
61.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.90
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
5.165
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-8.7%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
12
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
21
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
8
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity