Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/6d0e1cad-344a-4c20-b6a4-59e6558d4120/
ORIENTCER
Orient Ceratech LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.960
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.824
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 1.1
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
10.5%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
Rev +23%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
86.0%ile
P/E
21.0×
P/S
1.1×
P/B
1.5×
E/P
0.0476
FCF Yield
0.081
EBITDA/EV
0.105
SH Yield
0.007
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
15.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
11.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
10.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 8.1% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
79.0%ile
ROE
0.072
ROA
0.053
Net Margin
0.054
Op Margin
0.061
GPA
0.414
Current
3.12
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.234
Earn Growth
1.202
Stability
0.309
lower=better
Accruals
-0.071
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
78.0%ile
6M Return
-16.5%
12M Return
5.5%
12-1 Mom
13.9%
Risk-Adj
0.27
Vol 252d
51.9%
Vol 60d
117.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-35.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (117%) is expanding vs long-term (52%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.96
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
81.6%
Sector Quality %ile
82.7%
P/E z-score
-0.15
P/B z-score
-0.41
Sector Avg OS
54.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (86th) and quality (79th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (86th value) with strong momentum (78th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (86th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (117%) significantly exceeds 252-day (52%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
60.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
54.9% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
D
35.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
30.2% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.960 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.790 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.780 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.519 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
21.00
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0476
Price / Sales
1.14
Price / Book
1.52
Price / Cash Flow
8.97
FCF Yield
8.1%
EBITDA / EV
10.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.8225
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
7.2%
Return on Assets
5.3%
Net Margin
5.4%
Operating Margin
6.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
41.4%
Current Ratio
3.12
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.071
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-16.5%
12M Return
5.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
13.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.27
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
23.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
120.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.309
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.7%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
15
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
11
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
10
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity