Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/7789f7ac-46a1-4cff-80e7-618cc2673ba3/
RAYMONDREL
Raymond Realty LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
46.0%ile
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
55.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
54.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
54.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
45.0%ile
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
45.0%ile
6M Return
23.9%
Vol 252d
69.3%
Vol 60d
165.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-60.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (166%) is expanding vs long-term (69%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.4
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Real Estate
· 82 peers
Sector Value %ile
44.6%
Sector Quality %ile
50.6%
Sector Avg OS
42.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (166%) significantly exceeds 252-day (69%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
11.1% avg (1 factors)
Momentum
B
67.4% avg (1 factors)
Risk
F
1.1% avg (1 factors)
Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.400 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.460 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.450 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.450 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | — | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.190 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.693 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
23.9%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
55
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
54
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
54
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity