Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/7aacc354-fd4b-444d-b91b-e7f33f089c49/
EUROPRATIK
EURO PRATIK SALES LIMITEDSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
14.0%ile
P/E
31.8×
P/S
7.6×
P/B
8.4×
E/P
0.0315
FCF Yield
-0.005
EBITDA/EV
0.045
SH Yield
0.001
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
89.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
87.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
88.00000000
/100
P/E of 31.8x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. Negative FCF yield (-0.5%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 87.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
63.0%ile
ROE
0.264
ROA
0.207
Net Margin
0.239
Op Margin
0.300
GPA
0.392
Current
4.76
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.179
Earn Growth
0.015
Stability
0.173
lower=better
Accruals
0.104
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 26% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.104 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
55.0%ile
6M Return
-26.6%
Vol 252d
58.8%
Vol 60d
129.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-39.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (130%) is expanding vs long-term (59%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.21
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
10.3%
Sector Quality %ile
68.8%
P/E z-score
-0.12
P/B z-score
1.31
Sector Avg OS
54.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% |
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (26%) but high accruals (0.104) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (130%) significantly exceeds 252-day (59%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
22.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
81.2% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
4.3% avg (1 factors)
Risk
F
18.6% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.210 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.140 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.630 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.550 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.879 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.588 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
31.76
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0315
Price / Sales
7.58
Price / Book
8.39
Price / Cash Flow
63.98
FCF Yield
-0.5%
EBITDA / EV
4.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1316
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
26.4%
Return on Assets
20.7%
Net Margin
23.9%
Operating Margin
30.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
39.2%
Current Ratio
4.76
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.104
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.000
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-26.6%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
17.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.173
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.1%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
89
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
87
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
88
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity