Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/880a6973-a06f-4b00-bca9-325059cdd5c4/

AB9

ABO Energy GmbH & Co. KGaA
Chart
€5.73
Latest Week 2026-06-05
IndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionMICRO
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.58
OS Score
95.0%
Value
17.0%
Quality
0.0%
Momentum
#99.00000000
TV Rank
3/9
F-Score
0.402
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 3.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
24.1%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
10.5%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
95.0%ile
P/E
2.1×
P/S
0.1×
P/B
0.2×
E/P
0.4843
FCF Yield
-0.033
EBITDA/EV
0.241
SH Yield
0.105
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
5.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
3.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 2.1x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-3.3%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 3.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
17.0%ile
ROE
0.120
ROA
0.040
Net Margin
0.057
Op Margin
0.143
GPA
0.331
Current
6.17
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.489
Earn Growth
-0.061
Accruals
0.045
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
0.0%ile
6M Return
-55.8%
12M Return
-84.8%
12-1 Mom
-83.9%
Risk-Adj
-0.96
Vol 252d
87.1%
Vol 60d
213.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-89.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -84% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (213%) is expanding vs long-term (87%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.58
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials · 143 peers
Sector Value %ile
93.1%
Sector Quality %ile
20.1%
P/E z-score
-0.23
P/B z-score
-0.70
Sector Avg OS
50.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
MBB MBB SE 98.0% 90.0% 94.0% 74.0%
AAG Aumann AG 98.0% 93.0% 90.0% 63.0%
ERAG Ernst Russ AG 98.0% 94.0% 81.0% 72.0%
INR International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. 98.0% 89.0% 91.0% 73.0%
AFR0 Air France-KLM SA 97.0% 91.0% 76.0% 71.0%
QJQ ISS A/S 97.0% 98.0% 88.0% 51.0%
XD4 Strabag SE 97.0% 87.0% 86.0% 71.0%
ABS2 PORR AG 96.0% 92.0% 60.0% 83.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (95th value) but weak quality (17th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 49% with P/E of 2×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (0th) despite looking cheap (95th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (213%) significantly exceeds 252-day (87%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
85.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
50.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
0.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.580—0—
Value %ile0.950—1—
Quality %ile0.170—1—
Momentum %ile0.000—1—
F-Score3.000—1—
Confidence0.534—0—
Volatility0.871—1—
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
2.07
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.4843
Price / Sales
0.12
Price / Book
0.25
FCF Yield
-3.3%
EBITDA / EV
24.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
2.0132
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
10.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
12.0%
Return on Assets
4.0%
Net Margin
5.7%
Operating Margin
14.3%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
33.1%
Current Ratio
6.17
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.045
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-55.8%
12M Return
-84.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-83.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.96
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
48.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-6.1%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
10.5%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
5
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
3
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
99
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity