Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/89506a99-0e1d-45b9-8b60-131584d692b6/
TARAPUR
Tarapur Transformers LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
Yes
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
42.0%ile
P/B
144.6×
FCF Yield
0.523
EBITDA/EV
0.018
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
58.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
58.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
57.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 52.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
42.0%ile
ROE
-2.697
ROA
-0.063
GPA
-0.021
Current
0.63
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Stability
3.472
lower=better
Accruals
-2.316
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
40.0%ile
6M Return
-35.8%
12M Return
-20.1%
12-1 Mom
-7.0%
Risk-Adj
-0.13
Vol 252d
54.7%
Vol 60d
130.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-48.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (130%) is expanding vs long-term (55%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.31
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
48.2%
Sector Quality %ile
46.9%
P/B z-score
10.32
Sector Avg OS
44.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% |
Factor Interactions
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (130%) significantly exceeds 252-day (55%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
30.0% avg (4 factors)
Quality
F
21.0% avg (5 factors)
Momentum
F
14.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
25.4% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.310 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.420 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.420 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.400 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.650 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.547 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Book
144.61
Price / Cash Flow
1.51
FCF Yield
52.3%
EBITDA / EV
1.8%
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-269.7%
Return on Assets
-6.3%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
-2.1%
Current Ratio
0.63
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-2.316
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-35.8%
12M Return
-20.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-7.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.13
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
3.472
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
58
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
58
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
57
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
Yes
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity