Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a230528d-6668-46c5-beca-99e542e088ff/
ANUHPHR
Anuh Pharma LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 1.0
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
8.8%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
74.0%ile
P/E
18.5×
P/S
1.0×
P/B
2.2×
E/P
0.0541
FCF Yield
-0.014
EBITDA/EV
0.088
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
24.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
23.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
25.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-1.4%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
23.0%ile
ROE
0.117
ROA
0.074
Net Margin
0.053
Op Margin
0.062
GPA
0.309
Current
2.22
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.167
Earn Growth
-0.133
Stability
0.242
lower=better
Accruals
0.079
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
18.0%ile
6M Return
-8.0%
12M Return
-27.2%
12-1 Mom
-19.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.64
Vol 252d
30.5%
Vol 60d
68.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-33.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -20% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (68%) is expanding vs long-term (31%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.45
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Healthcare
· 160 peers
Sector Value %ile
93.2%
Sector Quality %ile
16.8%
P/E z-score
-0.23
P/B z-score
-0.70
Sector Avg OS
43.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATCOPHARM | 98.0% | 88.0% | 87.0% | 81.0% | |
| LINCOLN | 97.0% | 88.0% | 80.0% | 81.0% | |
| UNIVPHOTO | 97.0% | 86.0% | 74.0% | 94.0% | |
| VENUSREM | 96.0% | 68.0% | 94.0% | 99.0% | |
| STAR | 96.0% | 73.0% | 91.0% | 91.0% | |
| HALEOSLABS | 95.0% | 82.0% | 77.0% | 81.0% | |
| AUROPHARMA | 94.0% | 71.0% | 84.0% | 87.0% | |
| LUPIN | 93.0% | 64.0% | 98.0% | 82.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (74th value) but weak quality (23th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 17% with P/E of 18×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (18th) despite looking cheap (74th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (68%) significantly exceeds 252-day (31%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
48.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
42.2% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
11.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
65.8% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.450 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.740 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.230 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.180 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.909 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.305 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
18.48
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0541
Price / Sales
0.98
Price / Book
2.15
FCF Yield
-1.4%
EBITDA / EV
8.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.0279
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
11.7%
Return on Assets
7.4%
Net Margin
5.3%
Operating Margin
6.2%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
30.9%
Current Ratio
2.22
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.079
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-8.0%
12M Return
-27.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-19.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.64
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
16.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-13.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.242
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
24
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
23
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
25
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity