Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a679e234-f1fc-4819-ae27-3c034a42a73e/
GSFC
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 9.6
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 6.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
17.1%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
3.1%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
91.0%ile
P/E
9.6×
P/S
0.6×
P/B
0.5×
E/P
0.1039
FCF Yield
-0.027
EBITDA/EV
0.171
SH Yield
0.031
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
10.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
6.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
7.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-2.7%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 6.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
16.0%ile
ROE
0.055
ROA
0.047
Net Margin
0.061
Op Margin
0.054
GPA
0.242
Current
4.83
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.148
Earn Growth
0.138
Stability
0.722
lower=better
Accruals
0.037
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
24.0%ile
6M Return
-9.3%
12M Return
-20.6%
12-1 Mom
-14.0%
Risk-Adj
-0.52
Vol 252d
27.0%
Vol 60d
55.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-31.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -14% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (56%) is expanding vs long-term (27%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.65
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
89.4%
Sector Quality %ile
18.4%
P/E z-score
-0.18
P/B z-score
-0.66
Sector Avg OS
54.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (91th value) but weak quality (16th). Classic value trap risk.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (56%) significantly exceeds 252-day (27%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
69.6% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
42.8% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
15.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
71.6% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.650 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.910 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.160 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.240 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.270 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.63
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1039
Price / Sales
0.59
Price / Book
0.53
Price / Cash Flow
47.57
FCF Yield
-2.7%
EBITDA / EV
17.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.7341
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
3.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
5.5%
Return on Assets
4.7%
Net Margin
6.1%
Operating Margin
5.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
24.2%
Current Ratio
4.83
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.037
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.000
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-9.3%
12M Return
-20.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-14.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.52
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
14.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
13.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.722
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
3.1%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
10
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
6
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
7
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
59
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity