Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b0342114-edf6-4325-a733-d245efbd7ca3/
TIG
Team Internet Group plcSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.870
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.873
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 3.9
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
49.3%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +15%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
45.3%
💰
High Yield
Div 3.8%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
Yes
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 99th
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
3.9×
P/S
0.1×
P/B
0.6×
E/P
0.2545
FCF Yield
0.374
EBITDA/EV
0.493
SH Yield
0.453
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
1.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
1.00000000
/100
P/E of 3.9x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 37.4% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
77.0%ile
ROE
0.158
ROA
0.044
Net Margin
0.029
Op Margin
0.051
GPA
0.350
Current
0.96
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.149
Accruals
-0.093
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
8.0%ile
6M Return
-12.6%
12M Return
-39.8%
12-1 Mom
-40.9%
Risk-Adj
-1.05
Vol 252d
39.1%
Vol 60d
87.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-51.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -41% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (87%) is expanding vs long-term (39%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.87
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Communication Services
· 58 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
61.0%
P/E z-score
-1.19
P/B z-score
-0.54
Sector Avg OS
52.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (77th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (8th) despite looking cheap (99th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 45.3% backed by 37.4% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (87%) significantly exceeds 252-day (39%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
99.8% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
44.0% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
5.5% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
51.5% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.870 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.990 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.770 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.080 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.264 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.391 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
3.93
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.2545
Price / Sales
0.11
Price / Book
0.62
Price / Cash Flow
1.27
FCF Yield
37.4%
EBITDA / EV
49.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
4.8046
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
45.3%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
15.8%
Return on Assets
4.4%
Net Margin
2.9%
Operating Margin
5.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
35.0%
Current Ratio
0.96
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.093
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.073
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-12.6%
12M Return
-39.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-40.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-1.05
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
14.9%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
3.8%
Buyback Yield
41.6%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
1
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
1
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
64
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
Yes
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity