Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b536f0da-2a56-44e1-a60a-06d91d7a9862/
SHARDACROP
Sharda Cropchem LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.970
↗
Trending Value
#32.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.789
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 9.9
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 9.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
17.2%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +22%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
89.0%ile
P/E
9.9×
P/S
1.3×
P/B
2.6×
E/P
0.1006
FCF Yield
0.020
EBITDA/EV
0.172
SH Yield
0.014
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
13.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
9.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
10.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.9x places this firmly in deep value territory. VC2 score of 9.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
70.0%ile
ROE
0.258
ROA
0.140
Net Margin
0.131
Op Margin
0.172
GPA
0.366
Current
1.86
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.219
Earn Growth
1.237
Stability
0.622
lower=better
Accruals
0.027
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 26% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
86.0%ile
6M Return
3.3%
12M Return
15.7%
12-1 Mom
45.5%
Risk-Adj
0.72
Vol 252d
63.5%
Vol 60d
130.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-29.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 45% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (131%) is expanding vs long-term (64%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.97
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
85.4%
Sector Quality %ile
75.3%
P/E z-score
-0.18
P/B z-score
-0.15
Sector Avg OS
54.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (89th) and quality (70th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (89th value) with strong momentum (86th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 22% with P/E of 10×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (86th) but high volatility (64%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (131%) significantly exceeds 252-day (64%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
66.1% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
63.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
C
57.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
10.8% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.970 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.890 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.700 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.909 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.635 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.94
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1006
Price / Sales
1.31
Price / Book
2.57
Price / Cash Flow
12.28
FCF Yield
2.0%
EBITDA / EV
17.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7872
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
1.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
25.8%
Return on Assets
14.0%
Net Margin
13.1%
Operating Margin
17.2%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
36.6%
Current Ratio
1.86
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.027
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
3.3%
12M Return
15.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
45.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.72
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
21.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
123.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.622
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
1.4%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
13
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
9
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
10
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
32
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity