Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/e571c48c-3e83-4e59-b3a2-d12041194edb/
BALUFORGE
Balu Forge Industries LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
22.0%ile
P/E
22.5×
P/S
5.3×
P/B
3.6×
E/P
0.0445
FCF Yield
-0.055
EBITDA/EV
0.056
SH Yield
-0.042
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
79.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
85.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
85.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-5.5%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 85.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
29.0%ile
ROE
0.162
ROA
0.140
Net Margin
0.234
Op Margin
0.262
GPA
0.215
Current
3.54
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.199
Earn Growth
0.159
Stability
0.079
lower=better
Accruals
0.123
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Accruals ratio of 0.123 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
17.0%ile
6M Return
-22.7%
12M Return
-29.1%
12-1 Mom
-18.6%
Risk-Adj
-0.38
Vol 252d
49.1%
Vol 60d
119.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-45.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -19% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (120%) is expanding vs long-term (49%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.06
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
30.5%
Sector Quality %ile
33.5%
P/E z-score
-0.31
P/B z-score
-0.13
Sector Avg OS
44.9%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% |
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (16%) but high accruals (0.123) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (120%) significantly exceeds 252-day (49%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
34.8% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
64.8% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
8.5% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
34.8% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.060 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.220 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.290 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.170 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.491 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
22.47
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0445
Price / Sales
5.25
Price / Book
3.65
Price / Cash Flow
183.55
FCF Yield
-5.5%
EBITDA / EV
5.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1882
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-4.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
16.2%
Return on Assets
14.0%
Net Margin
23.4%
Operating Margin
26.2%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
21.5%
Current Ratio
3.54
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.123
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-22.7%
12M Return
-29.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-18.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.38
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
19.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
15.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.079
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-4.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
79
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
85
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
85
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity