Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/eb3e9e72-db39-467b-bbed-04ce5b9a7f5f/
REDINGTON
Redington LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
5 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.2
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 10.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
14.3%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
2.8%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
85.0%ile
P/E
10.6×
P/S
0.2×
P/B
1.8×
E/P
0.0946
FCF Yield
0.002
EBITDA/EV
0.143
SH Yield
0.028
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
17.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
10.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
12.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. VC2 score of 10.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
26.0%ile
ROE
0.174
ROA
0.052
Net Margin
0.015
Op Margin
0.018
GPA
0.124
Current
1.41
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.200
Earn Growth
-0.071
Stability
0.330
lower=better
Accruals
0.045
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
28.0%ile
6M Return
-11.1%
12M Return
-13.6%
12-1 Mom
-19.4%
Risk-Adj
-0.40
Vol 252d
48.8%
Vol 60d
112.9%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-36.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -19% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (113%) is expanding vs long-term (49%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.66
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology
· 181 peers
Sector Value %ile
91.2%
Sector Quality %ile
25.8%
P/E z-score
-0.29
P/B z-score
-0.16
Sector Avg OS
43.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAAREEINDO | 96.0% | 78.0% | 89.0% | 86.0% | |
| RPSGVENT | 95.0% | 92.0% | 61.0% | 75.0% | |
| INFOBEAN | 94.0% | 65.0% | 91.0% | 96.0% | |
| GTLINFRA | 94.0% | 87.0% | 66.0% | 73.0% | |
| DATAMATICS | 94.0% | 67.0% | 91.0% | 90.0% | |
| SIGMA | 93.0% | 67.0% | 95.0% | 81.0% | |
| ONWARDTEC | 92.0% | 91.0% | 85.0% | 36.0% | |
| IVALUE | 92.0% | 92.0% | 69.0% | 51.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (85th value) but weak quality (26th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 20% with P/E of 11×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (113%) significantly exceeds 252-day (49%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
66.2% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
31.4% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
16.1% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
35.3% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.660 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.850 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.260 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.280 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.488 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.57
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0946
Price / Sales
0.16
Price / Book
1.84
Price / Cash Flow
80.77
FCF Yield
0.2%
EBITDA / EV
14.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
5.7073
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
2.8%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
17.4%
Return on Assets
5.2%
Net Margin
1.5%
Operating Margin
1.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
12.4%
Current Ratio
1.41
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.045
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-11.1%
12M Return
-13.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-19.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.40
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
20.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-7.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.330
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
2.8%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
17
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
10
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
12
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
61
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity