Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f2dd04f4-586d-4cba-91a2-1e26704d4589/
OSWALPUMPS
OSWAL PUMPS LIMITEDSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
11.0%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
73.0%ile
P/E
12.5×
P/S
2.3×
P/B
2.8×
E/P
0.0800
FCF Yield
-0.044
EBITDA/EV
0.110
SH Yield
-0.179
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
27.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
38.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
38.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-4.4%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
25.0%ile
ROE
0.224
ROA
0.175
Net Margin
0.182
Op Margin
0.241
GPA
0.378
Current
4.55
F-Score
1/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.443
Stability
0.155
lower=better
Accruals
0.211
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 22% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.211 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest. F-Score of 1/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
46.0%ile
6M Return
-20.7%
Vol 252d
50.1%
Vol 60d
113.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-66.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (113%) is expanding vs long-term (50%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.62
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
76.3%
Sector Quality %ile
27.9%
P/E z-score
-0.42
P/B z-score
-0.19
Sector Avg OS
44.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (73th value) but weak quality (25th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 44% with P/E of 13×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (22%) but high accruals (0.211) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (113%) significantly exceeds 252-day (50%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
49.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
69.7% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
11.6% avg (1 factors)
Risk
D
33.2% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.620 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.730 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.250 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.460 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 1.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.848 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.501 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
12.50
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0800
Price / Sales
2.28
Price / Book
2.80
FCF Yield
-4.4%
EBITDA / EV
11.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.4263
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-17.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
22.4%
Return on Assets
17.5%
Net Margin
18.2%
Operating Margin
24.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
37.8%
Current Ratio
4.55
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.211
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-20.7%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
44.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.155
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
1
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-17.9%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
27
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
38
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
38
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity