Pattern Intelligence ยท CPH

CPHCAP-ST quant read

Copenhagen Capital A/S ยท Real Estate

The nearest historical setups point to a positive historical outcomes, and the completed-week chart evidence supports it.

1-week positive match rate 57.0%

Unclear ยท avg analogue +0.44%

Mixed historical lean
4-week blended positive rate 73.7%

Historically positive ยท avg analogue +2.73%

Moderate historical lean
Completed-week chart evidence Chart evidence supports the read

4 of the core evidence blocks are supportive.

Evidence agreement Evidence not decisive

Confirmation is present while price holds above trend and relative strength remains firm.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Compare the stored pattern with completed weekly prices. The Fair Value line is the latest reference within this chart, held constant across the display.

Close
7.95
Trend Line
7.38
Fair value
6.00
Hover chart for weekly context.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Selected 4-week example returns

Each bar is a stored exampleโ€™s subsequent return, ordered by similarity. This selected set differs from the weighted global, sector and industry blend above.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.
Outcome frame

How varied were the historical outcomes?

The lower quartile, median and upper quartile of the selected examples. Actual future outcomes can fall outside this historical range.

Lower quartile +1.08%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Median example +3.86%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Upper quartile +5.91%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the historical read.

Price vs Trend Line +7.74%

Price is comfortably above its medium-term trend.

Price vs Fair Value +32.41%

Price is stretched above the current Fair Value estimate.

Market Dynamics +0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength +0.11

The stock is showing relative leadership.

Market Activity +0.32

This component is supportive.

Price Cycle +0.32

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the selected-example statistics.

Ticker Week Similarity Outcome 4W return
HWBK
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.6631 higher +6.73%
NAVIGO-PREF
STO
2026-06-12 0.6622 higher +5.93%
FDSB
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6616 higher +10.67%
NAVIGO-PREF
STO
2026-06-05 0.6612 higher +5.60%
MYFW
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.6601 higher +13.06%
1038
HKG
2026-06-12 0.6525 higher +5.12%
PNCF
VIE
2026-06-12 0.6525 higher +7.77%
HTB
NYSE
2026-06-05 0.6436 higher +4.68%
INDB
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6427 higher +1.30%
UBSI
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.642 higher +1.01%
0006
HKG
2026-06-12 0.6412 higher +4.75%
NTB
NYSE
2026-06-12 0.64 higher +2.74%
PDLB
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.6392 higher +5.84%
TCBI
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.6365 higher +2.22%
KRNY
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.635 higher +12.76%
PFG
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6339 higher +1.00%
CPF
NYSE
2026-06-05 0.6338 higher +8.78%
V1OD34
SAO
2026-06-12 0.6327 lower -4.28%
SMBC
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.631 higher +2.88%
BCIA11
SAO
2026-06-12 0.6306 lower -1.83%
QCRH
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6306 higher +0.28%
VLY
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6296 higher +0.84%
ALLIGO-B
STO
2026-06-05 0.6292 lower -6.76%
MILS3
SAO
2026-06-12 0.6282 higher +1.58%
SMBK
NYSE
2026-06-05 0.6265 higher +11.99%
PFS
NYSE
2026-06-12 0.6239 higher +0.04%
2270
JPX
2026-06-12 0.6237 higher +1.38%
NTB
NYSE
2026-06-05 0.6237 higher +3.04%
BVFL
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6234 higher +5.25%
CWBC
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.6232 higher +4.85%
Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

  • Volume pressure 1.88202
  • Sector structure 0.85619
  • Trend Signal 0.63858
  • Close location 0.49917
This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when historical rate, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.
Sample audit ยท Selected examples

How much evidence stands behind the reading?

30 distinct examples across 28 companies and 2 entry weeks. 2026-06-05โ€“2026-06-12.

Median return3.86%4 weeks after entry
Middle 80% of outcomes-0.14% to 10.80%10thโ€“90th historical percentiles
Largest company share7%Of selected examples
Weight-equivalent sample30.0Accounts for unequal weights, not dependence

The distribution, including losses

< โˆ’10%
0
โˆ’10 to โˆ’5%
1
โˆ’5 to 0%
2
0 to 5%
15
5 to 10%
8
โ‰ฅ 10%
4

0 unchanged outcomes. Bins use equal counts, not similarity weights; positive means strictly above zero.

Does one observation change the story?

Selected-example mean
3.97%
Without the best outcome
3.66%
Without the worst outcome
4.34%
Non-overlapping within each company
3.95% ยท 28 cases

The two exclusion checks show how much the extremes affect the mean. Companies can still share the same market shock; these checks do not prove independence.

Peer comparison

Does the result travel across comparison groups?

The headline 4-week rate blends these stored groups. The selected example chart and one-week calculation use a combined shortlist, so they will not necessarily reproduce that blend.

Comparison groupPositive rateMean returnMatchesBlend weightMedian similarity
Global
90.1%
4.02%3079%0.63
IndustrySame country
13.7%
-1.99%1021%-0.20

Groups can share examples. Their counts must not be added together as independent observations. Similarity measures resemblance, not a likelihood of success.

Research playbook

What would strengthen or weaken this case?

Continuation

Historical lean meets chart support

Confirmation is present while price holds above trend and relative strength remains firm.

Look for the next completed weekly observation to sustain agreement in trend, relative strength and activity.

Conflict

Similar history, different conditions

If current price and direction oppose the historical lean, keep it as an unconfirmed case. Review the weaker peer group and whether the result depends on extreme examples.

Reassessment

The setup changes

A change in trend, fading relative strength or a materially different pattern can make the old matches less relevant. Recheck the pattern date and the next published reading.

Method and limits

Read the evidence in the right order

1. Compare like with like

Weekly price and indicator conditions are matched with resolved historical setups. Each listing appears once, using its most recent stored reading. Check the date and outcome horizon.

2. Separate frequency from payoff

The headline is a similarity-weighted blend of global, same-country sector and industry results where available. A high positive rate can coexist with large losses. Inspect the median, tails and individual examples.

3. Demand current confirmation

These are descriptive historical matches, not calibrated odds or an independently validated trading edge. Examples may overlap in time, share companies and reflect later data corrections. Costs, liquidity and delisted-company coverage need separate evaluation.

Evidence context