Pattern Intelligence ยท SHZ

300781 quant read

Guangdong Insight Brand Marketing Group Co.,Ltd. ยท Communication Services

The nearest historical setups point to downside risk, and the completed-week chart evidence supports that caution.

1-week positive match rate 39.8%

Historically negative ยท avg analogue -0.58%

Moderate historical lean
4-week blended positive rate 35.2%

Historically negative ยท avg analogue -0.05%

Moderate historical lean
Completed-week chart evidence Chart evidence challenges the read

4 of the core evidence blocks are acting as headwinds.

Evidence agreement Clean alignment

Downside risk is confirmed while price remains below trend and relative strength keeps lagging.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Compare the stored pattern with completed weekly prices. The Fair Value line is the latest reference within this chart, held constant across the display.

Close
26.91
Trend Line
30.25
Fair value
34.24
Hover chart for weekly context.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Selected 4-week example returns

Each bar is a stored exampleโ€™s subsequent return, ordered by similarity. This selected set differs from the weighted global, sector and industry blend above.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.
Outcome frame

How varied were the historical outcomes?

The lower quartile, median and upper quartile of the selected examples. Actual future outcomes can fall outside this historical range.

Lower quartile -1.89%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Median example +1.30%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Upper quartile +8.39%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the historical read.

Price vs Trend Line -11.04%

Price is below trend, which keeps pressure on the setup.

Price vs Fair Value -21.40%

Price is trading below Fair Value, which can create recovery potential if pressure improves.

Market Dynamics +0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.14

The stock is lagging relative strength.

Market Activity -0.23

This component is a drag.

Price Cycle -0.21

This component is a drag.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the selected-example statistics.

Ticker Week Similarity Outcome 4W return
ADSL
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7415 higher +2.70%
CORALFINAC
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7412 higher +2.85%
BANG
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7353 lower -17.18%
CNNE
NYSE
2026-06-05 0.7327 higher +3.03%
PTRK
STO
2026-06-05 0.724 lower -1.93%
RADHIKAJWE
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7214 lower -0.11%
0259
KLS
2026-06-12 0.7214 lower -4.00%
RXRX
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.721 higher +14.63%
ARKADE
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7208 higher +10.07%
BTBTN
MEX
2026-06-12 0.7199 lower -0.37%
NILAINFRA
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7191 lower -1.77%
DVL
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7183 lower -0.50%
GANESHHOU
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7173 higher +3.81%
QUICKHEAL
NSI
2026-06-05 0.717 lower -4.97%
XCHANGING
NSI
2026-06-05 0.714 lower -0.97%
ALBLD
PAR
2026-06-05 0.7137 higher +4.90%
ARJO-B
STO
2026-06-05 0.7127 higher +9.32%
A1TH34
SAO
2026-06-12 0.7126 higher +35.36%
MMGR-B
STO
2026-06-05 0.7124 higher +9.52%
5302
KLS
2026-06-12 0.7123 higher +11.51%
GOLDTECH
NSI
2026-06-05 0.712 higher +43.65%
ARCHIES
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7086 lower -0.21%
TTML
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7084 lower -7.34%
8176
KLS
2026-06-12 0.7077 higher +4.35%
7203
SAU
2026-06-12 0.7073 lower -5.42%
KOSS
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.7064 lower -0.25%
0083
KLS
2026-06-12 0.706 higher +22.89%
REMSONSIND
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7051 lower -2.47%
TACT
NASDAQ
2026-06-05 0.7051 higher +5.62%
GFLLIMITED
NSI
2026-06-05 0.7045 lower -2.87%
Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

  • Sector structure 0.85601
  • Volume pressure 0.79713
  • Trend Signal -0.3614
  • Price Cycle -0.30679
This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when historical rate, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.
Sample audit ยท Selected examples

How much evidence stands behind the reading?

30 distinct examples across 30 companies and 2 entry weeks. 2026-06-05โ€“2026-06-12.

Median return1.30%4 weeks after entry
Middle 80% of outcomes-5.01% to 15.46%10thโ€“90th historical percentiles
Largest company share3%Of selected examples
Weight-equivalent sample30.0Accounts for unequal weights, not dependence

The distribution, including losses

< โˆ’10%
1
โˆ’10 to โˆ’5%
2
โˆ’5 to 0%
12
0 to 5%
6
5 to 10%
3
โ‰ฅ 10%
6

0 unchanged outcomes. Bins use equal counts, not similarity weights; positive means strictly above zero.

Does one observation change the story?

Selected-example mean
4.46%
Without the best outcome
3.11%
Without the worst outcome
5.21%
Non-overlapping within each company
4.46% ยท 30 cases

The two exclusion checks show how much the extremes affect the mean. Companies can still share the same market shock; these checks do not prove independence.

Peer comparison

Does the result travel across comparison groups?

The headline 4-week rate blends these stored groups. The selected example chart and one-week calculation use a combined shortlist, so they will not necessarily reproduce that blend.

Comparison groupPositive rateMean returnMatchesBlend weightMedian similarity
Global
50.1%
4.43%3055%0.71
SectorSame country
13.3%
-5.34%3030%0.49
IndustrySame country
24.5%
-5.88%3015%0.10

Groups can share examples. Their counts must not be added together as independent observations. Similarity measures resemblance, not a likelihood of success.

Research playbook

What would strengthen or weaken this case?

Continuation

Historical lean meets chart support

Downside risk is confirmed while price remains below trend and relative strength keeps lagging.

Look for the next completed weekly observation to sustain agreement in trend, relative strength and activity.

Conflict

Similar history, different conditions

If current price and direction oppose the historical lean, keep it as an unconfirmed case. Review the weaker peer group and whether the result depends on extreme examples.

Reassessment

The setup changes

A change in trend, fading relative strength or a materially different pattern can make the old matches less relevant. Recheck the pattern date and the next published reading.

Method and limits

Read the evidence in the right order

1. Compare like with like

Weekly price and indicator conditions are matched with resolved historical setups. Each listing appears once, using its most recent stored reading. Check the date and outcome horizon.

2. Separate frequency from payoff

The headline is a similarity-weighted blend of global, same-country sector and industry results where available. A high positive rate can coexist with large losses. Inspect the median, tails and individual examples.

3. Demand current confirmation

These are descriptive historical matches, not calibrated odds or an independently validated trading edge. Examples may overlap in time, share companies and reflect later data corrections. Costs, liquidity and delisted-company coverage need separate evaluation.

Evidence context