Week Ending: 11 September 2026

Finland FI Sector

Technology

For the week ending 11 September 2026, Technology declined 1.17% with 10 advancing, 17 declining, and 1 unchanged constituents. The index is equal weighted and built from country-listed equities.

Current architecture Balance

Directional pressure is compressed and neither side has durable control.

45 technical evidence
Index1042.79 1 week-1.17% Breadth36% Members28
Country 🇫🇮 Finland · FI
Universe country-listed
Price basis Adjusted weekly close

Trend architecture

Index, activity fan and structural anchors

Rolling 156-week evidence. Trend Signal points mark weeks when price, trend and the activity fan confirmed together.

Index Value Trend Line Fair Value Activity Lines Constructive architecture Transitional architecture Defensive architecture
Current architecture Balance 2 completed weeks in this state
Trend acceptance -0.2% Index versus Trend Line
Persistence 75% Negative regime, horizons divided
Participation 36% 10 advancing, 17 declining

Investor positioning lens

Is the evidence ready for capital?

A rules-based technical classification using trend, breadth, persistence, relative strength and path quality.

Current posture Reduce exposure into strength

Counter-trend rallies may occur, but primary structure and persistence do not yet support adding risk.

45 technical evidence
out of 100
Evidence balance

Five-pillar map

Reduce
Trend
40
Breadth
44
Persistence
40
Relative
36
Risk quality
88
What supports the view
  • No major confirming factor has secured control.
What restrains conviction
  • Index trend architecture has not delivered a durable upward expansion.
  • Breadth remains too narrow or inconsistent for a high-conviction position.
  • Constituent persistence remains divided or predominantly negative.
  • The group is not yet delivering dependable relative outperformance.
  • Stage 4 declining constituents exceed Stage 2 advancing constituents by 33 percentage points.
  • Positive contribution is concentrated in a small leadership cohort.

This is a weekly research classification, not personal investment advice. Sentiment is reported as an independent confirmation layer and does not alter the technical score.

Trend state and durability

Architecture, persistence and constituent regimes

The index path is tested against the underlying security-level trend evidence.

Index architecture Balance

Directional pressure is compressed and neither side has durable control.

State age2 weeks
Trend gateMixed
Fan width1.02%
Fast versus slow change1.96 pts
Above 67% Below 0%
Six completed weeks of price acceptance relative to the full Activity Line fan.
Index persistence

Negative regime, horizons divided

75% agreement

The 52-week trend is negative, while shorter horizons remain mixed.

13-week
-1.1%
26-week
0.4%
39-week
-6.2%
52-week
-8.7%
Regime age35 weeks 52-week flips2 52-week boundary1142.34
Constituent trend persistence

Is the index move broadly durable?

100% coverage
Coherent positive21%
Coherent negative32%
Average horizon agreement84%
Positive horizon share44%
Weakening positives4
Repairing negatives6

28 constituents measured as of 11 Sep 2026. Median trend age is 41 weeks.

Custom stage map

Where constituents sit in the cycle

100% coverage
Stage 1 · Basing11%3 securities
Stage 2 · Advancing21%6 securities
Stage 3 · Distribution14%4 securities
Stage 4 · Declining54%15 securities
Re-acceleration watch2 Transition watch4 Relative strength leaders14% Fair Value repairs3

Measured as of 11 Sep 2026. Stages summarize price, Activity Line architecture, Fair Value position and relative evidence.

Architecture breadth

How market energy is distributed

73/100 mean confidence
Upward expansion
21% 6
Rotation up
11% 3
Deceleration
18% 5
Balance
4% 1
Rotation down
0% 0
Downward expansion
46% 13
Unresolved
0% 0

Architecture breadth shows the distribution of expanding, rotating, balancing and contracting securities. It is diagnostic context and is not added as a second vote in the positioning score.

Capital rotation

Performance relative to FI Market Structure

Weakening
Relative index 13-week relative trend Starting level
Rotation dashboard Weakening

A rising relative line means this group is compounding faster than FI Market Structure. A falling line means capital has done better in the parent benchmark.

Relative index81.0
13-week trend82.0
4-week trend change-1.77%
Weekly peer rank5 of 9
1 week
-0.7 pts relative
4 weeks
-0.6 pts relative
13 weeks
-4.6 pts relative
26 weeks
-5.4 pts relative
52 weeks
-10.3 pts relative

Market internals

Participation, dispersion and path risk

Equal-weight index evidence with constituent-level breadth and dispersion.

Breadth

Participation quality

Narrow
Advancing
10
Declining
17
Unchanged
1
4-week average 41%
13-week average 47%
Risk and persistence

Path quality

52-week lens
Annualised weekly volatility11.8%
Drawdown from 52-week high-12.1%
Positive weeks, last 1346%
Current directional run2 weeks
Turnover versus 13-week norm214%
Breadth impulse-11.9 pts
Cross-section

Return distribution

28 measured
Q1 -3.7% Median -1.1% Q3 0.9%
Average winner3.8%
Average loser-4.2%
Dispersion5.2 pts
Top-five upside share90%
Top-five capital share97%
Capital data coverage100%

Dispersion describes how far constituent outcomes are spreading apart. Capital concentration is contextual only; the index itself is equal weighted.

Momentum cycle

30-week persistence

Positive readings show expansion. Negative readings show contraction.

Breadth cycle

Net participation

Advancers less decliners as a percentage of measured constituents.

Industry map

Where sector leadership is forming

Performance, breadth and trend acceptance across every qualified industry.

2/4 positive
Above Trend Line2/450% of industries
Constructive breadth2/4At least half advancing
Median industry-0.06%2.61 pts dispersion

News and narrative

Does company news confirm the market tape?

Open Sentiment Intelligence
Sentiment evidence is still developing

Qualified company-level news coverage is not yet broad enough to influence the group view.

0 qualified records across 28 measured constituents.

Leadership tape

Leaders, laggards and contribution shape

Latest completed week, ranked on uncapped constituent returns.

Constituent ledger

Sector constituents

All 28 measured constituents, ranked by latest weekly return.

Rank Ticker Company Exchange Market cap Close Index contribution Return
1 NOKIA Nokia Oyj HEL 48.09B 9.56 0.37 pts
10.42%
2 SOLTEQ Solteq Oyj HEL 5.61M 0.318 0.34 pts
9.66%
3 BITTI Bittium Oyj HEL 1.28B 36.15 0.23 pts
6.32%
4 ACG1V Aspocomp Group Oyj HEL 41.10M 5.50 0.18 pts
4.96%
5 GOFORE Gofore Oyj HEL 187.05M 11.96 0.09 pts
2.57%
6 DIGIA Digia Oyj HEL 148.42M 5.62 0.04 pts
1.08%
7 FSECURE F-Secure Oyj HEL 340.69M 1.94 0.03 pts
0.94%
8 WITTED Witted Megacorp Oyj HEL 23.85M 1.63 0.03 pts
0.93%
9 LOIHDE Loihde Oyj HEL 70.59M 12.30 0.03 pts
0.82%
10 ADMCM Admicom Oyj HEL 127.19M 26.35 0.01 pts
0.19%
11 DWF Digital Workforce Services Oyj HEL 29.59M 2.57 0.00 pts
0.00%
12 VAIAS Vaisala Oyj HEL 1.99B 57.20 -0.02 pts
-0.52%
13 TLT1V Teleste Oyj HEL 61.78M 3.37 -0.02 pts
-0.59%
14 TEM1V Tecnotree Oyj HEL 147.85M 6.67 -0.03 pts
-0.89%
15 TIETO Tieto Oyj HEL 2.11B 19.10 -0.05 pts
-1.29%
16 SSH1V SSH Communications Security Oyj HEL 115.77M 2.22 -0.05 pts
-1.33%
17 ERIBR Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) HEL 28.61B 8.66 -0.05 pts
-1.34%
18 ICP1V Incap Oyj HEL 240.19M 8.28 -0.06 pts
-1.55%
19 DETEC Detection Technology Oyj HEL 111.09M 7.66 -0.09 pts
-2.54%
20 SIILI Siili Solutions Oyj HEL 25.54M 3.16 -0.10 pts
-2.77%
21 QTCOM Qt Group Oyj HEL 870.92M 34.12 -0.13 pts
-3.67%
22 QPR1V QPR Software Oyj HEL 10.38M 0.524 -0.13 pts
-3.68%
23 VINCIT Vincit Oyj HEL 18.61M 1.07 -0.20 pts
-5.73%
24 LEMON Lemonsoft Oyj HEL 84.35M 4.65 -0.22 pts
-6.06%
25 LEADD LeadDesk Oyj HEL 16.71M 2.90 -0.22 pts
-6.15%
26 DIGIGR Digitalist Group Plc HEL 4.41M 1.60 -0.29 pts
-8.05%
27 NETUM Netum Group Oyj HEL 8.91M 0.75 -0.40 pts
-11.14%
28 PALLAS Pallas Air Oyj HEL 617,406 0.45 -0.48 pts
-13.46%

The index uses capped equal-weight weekly constituent returns. The ledger shows uncapped security returns so outliers remain visible for research.

Evidence context