The evidence is balanced enough to avoid a defensive call, but not aligned enough for aggressive positioning.
51
technical evidence
out of 100
out of 100
Week Ending: 4 September 2026
Hong Kong HK Consumer Cyclical Industry
Luxury Goods
For the week ending 04 September 2026, Luxury Goods advanced 1.03% with 14 advancing, 12 declining, and 5 unchanged constituents. The index is equal weighted and the constituent tape shows uncapped security returns.
Current architecture
Unresolved
The Activity Lines, Trend Line and price acceptance remain genuinely mixed.
51
technical evidence
Index712.99
1 week1.03%
Breadth45%
Members31
Country
🇭🇰 Hong Kong · HK
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
Universe
country-listed
Price basis
Adjusted weekly close
Trend architecture
Index, activity fan and structural anchors
Rolling 156-week evidence. Trend Signal points mark weeks when price, trend and the activity fan confirmed together.
Index Value
Trend Line
Fair Value
Activity Lines
Constructive architecture
Transitional architecture
Defensive architecture
Current architecture
Unresolved
7 completed weeks in this state
Trend acceptance
3.0%
Index versus Trend Line
Persistence
75%
Negative regime, shorter trend repairing
Participation
45%
14 advancing, 12 declining
Investor positioning lens
Is the evidence ready for capital?
A rules-based technical classification using trend, breadth, persistence, relative strength and path quality.
Evidence balance
Wait
Five-pillar map
Trend
40
Breadth
45
Persistence
42
Relative
74
Risk quality
84
What supports the view
- Relative performance is improving within its parent hierarchy.
What restrains conviction
- Index trend architecture has not delivered a durable upward expansion.
- Breadth remains too narrow or inconsistent for a high-conviction position.
- Constituent persistence remains divided or predominantly negative.
- Stage 4 declining constituents exceed Stage 2 advancing constituents by 23 percentage points.
- Positive contribution is concentrated in a small leadership cohort.
This is a weekly research classification, not personal investment advice. Sentiment is reported as an independent confirmation layer and does not alter the technical score.
Trend state and durability
Architecture, persistence and constituent regimes
The index path is tested against the underlying security-level trend evidence.
The Activity Lines, Trend Line and price acceptance remain genuinely mixed.
State age7 weeks
Trend gateMixed
Fan width4.01%
Fast versus slow change3.92 pts
Above 67%
Below 0%
Six completed weeks of price acceptance relative to the full Activity Line fan.
Index persistence
75% agreement
Negative regime, shorter trend repairing
The long trend remains negative, but shorter-horizon repair is now visible.
13-week
8.0%
26-week
-2.9%
39-week
-7.0%
52-week
-11.2%
Constituent trend persistence
97% coverage
Is the index move broadly durable?
40%positive
Coherent positive23%
Coherent negative30%
Average horizon agreement83%
Positive horizon share42%
Weakening positives2
Repairing negatives5
30 constituents measured as of 4 Sep 2026. Median trend age is 12 weeks.
Custom stage map
97% coverage
Where constituents sit in the cycle
50%Stage 4
Stage 1 · Basing17%5 securities
Stage 2 · Advancing27%8 securities
Stage 3 · Distribution7%2 securities
Stage 4 · Declining50%15 securities
Re-acceleration watch0
Transition watch1
Relative strength leaders33%
Fair Value repairs4
Measured as of 4 Sep 2026. Stages summarize price, Activity Line architecture, Fair Value position and relative evidence.
Architecture breadth
75/100 mean confidence
How market energy is distributed
Architecture breadth shows the distribution of expanding, rotating, balancing and contracting securities. It is diagnostic context and is not added as a second vote in the positioning score.
Capital rotation
Performance relative to Consumer Cyclical
Relative index
13-week relative trend
Starting level
A rising relative line means this group is compounding faster than Consumer Cyclical. A falling line means capital has done better in the parent benchmark.
Relative index111.4
13-week trend104.0
4-week trend change3.32%
Weekly peer rank7 of 21
1 week
1.1 pts
relative
4 weeks
5.7 pts
relative
13 weeks
13.0 pts
relative
26 weeks
7.3 pts
relative
52 weeks
0.3 pts
relative
Market internals
Participation, dispersion and path risk
Equal-weight index evidence with constituent-level breadth and dispersion.
Breadth
Balanced
Participation quality
45%
advanced
- Advancing
- 14
- Declining
- 12
- Unchanged
- 5
Risk and persistence
52-week lens
Path quality
Annualised weekly volatility12.6%
Drawdown from 52-week high-12.7%
Positive weeks, last 1377%
Current directional run10 weeks
Turnover versus 13-week norm222%
Breadth impulse0.3 pts
Cross-section
31 measured
Return distribution
Q1 -4.7%
Median 0.0%
Q3 4.5%
Average winner8.2%
Average loser-6.5%
Dispersion9.1 pts
Top-five upside share74%
Top-five capital share92%
Capital data coverage100%
Dispersion describes how far constituent outcomes are spreading apart. Capital concentration is contextual only; the index itself is equal weighted.
Momentum cycle
30-week persistence
Positive readings show expansion. Negative readings show contraction.
Breadth cycle
Net participation
Advancers less decliners as a percentage of measured constituents.
News and narrative
Does company news confirm the market tape?
Sentiment evidence is still developing
Qualified company-level news coverage is not yet broad enough to influence the group view.
0 qualified records across 31 measured constituents.Leadership tape
Leaders, laggards and contribution shape
Latest completed week, ranked on uncapped constituent returns.
Constituent ledger
Industry constituents
All 31 measured constituents, ranked by latest weekly return.
Rank
Ticker
Company
Exchange
Market cap
Close
Index contribution
Return
The index uses capped equal-weight weekly constituent returns. The ledger shows uncapped security returns so outliers remain visible for research.