Crowd view
No votes yet

TWO · Equity · completed-week research

7737 Technicals

KDAN

Technology Software - Application

Week ending14 August 2026
-3.1%
Open
38.90
High
38.90
Low
35.80
Close
37.70 TWD
Price-technical state Aligned downward Price structure only · 79 completed observations · through 2026-08-14
Price structureAligned downwardcompleted-week alignment
Momentum37.2Negative
Risk pressure8.8%Normal
Trend quality19.5Range-led

Market Dynamics

What is happening beneath the price?

Price shows the result. Market Dynamics shows whether the underlying support is strengthening or weakening.

Market Dynamics Report
Evidence aligned downward

Downward price structure is confirmed by Market Dynamics

Price structure and the underlying tape currently reinforce the same downside read.

What it means

The downside state remains confirmed until Market Dynamics repairs or price structure changes.

Current tape relationshipAccumulation pressure

Market Dynamics weakened this week and remains below zero.

Price locationAccumulation zone

Price is being tested for a confirmed recovery through the lower zone.

Latest positioning markerNone in view

Entering the lower zone alone does not create a positioning confirmation.

Market Dynamics confirmationWeakening

Underlying support has contracted across the recent completed path.

Chart readingPrice is in the accumulation zone. The Market Dynamics bars show whether underlying conditions are repairing or continuing to weaken.

Weekly close Supportive Market Dynamics Cautious Market Dynamics Accumulation zone Distribution zone Positioning recovery Distribution rollover Price / pressure gap

What it means for 7737

The current reading in four steps

The downside remains supported until Market Dynamics repairs or price structure changes.

1
NowEasier this week

Market Dynamics weakened this week and remains below zero.

2
Recent directionWeakened over four weeks

Underlying support has contracted across the recent completed path.

3
Price responsePrice structure is downward

Price is responding in the same broad direction as Market Dynamics.

4
Previous cases33.3% moved lower

After 12 weeks across 3 cases. Average move: 9.9%.

What strengthens this viewThe downside state remains confirmed until Market Dynamics repairs or price structure changes.What would change itReassess the reading when either price structure or the Market Dynamics state changes materially.

What happened before

How this ticker behaved in similar conditions

Zone visits are counted once and followed through completed weekly closes. Open cases remain separate.

Price relationship Meaningful relationship
Same-week correlation
0.42
Direction agreed
56.8%
Completed comparisons
44
After accumulation4 distinct visits
4 weeks100.0% higher3 outcomes 12 weeks100.0% higher3 outcomes 26 weeks100.0% higher1 outcome

Average time before leaving the zone: 1.3 weeks.

After distribution3 distinct visits
4 weeks66.7% lower3 outcomes 12 weeks100.0% lower3 outcomes 26 weeks100.0% lower3 outcomes

Average time before leaving the zone: 1.0 weeks.

When the two readings agreed or differed

What usually happened next

These cases compare price direction with Market Dynamics and show how large disagreements were resolved.

Price higher · Market Dynamics positive 50.0% were higher

Average 12-week move: -5.3% from 2 completed cases.

Price lower · Market Dynamics negative 33.3% were lower

Average 12-week move: 9.9% from 3 completed cases.

Price higher · Market Dynamics cautious Average pullback 11.8%

50.0% were lower after 12 weeks. The deepest pullback arrived after 8.5 weeks on average.

Price cautious · Market Dynamics positive Average recovery 12.5%

66.7% were higher after 12 weeks. The strongest recovery arrived after 5.3 weeks on average.

How to use the reading

Strategy observations from this ticker's own record

The current reading identifies the setup. The observations below show how this ticker's completed history can guide positioning, confirmation and risk control without treating any one reading as a forecast.

Capital protection
Treat agreement on the downside as a defensive condition

In this ticker's completed record, 33.3% of comparable cases moved lower after 12 weeks, with an average move of 9.9% across 3 cases.

ApproachReduce the burden of proof for risk control and raise it for new long exposure. A short position still needs a defined entry, exit and maximum loss.

Review the case whenReassess the reading when either price structure or the Market Dynamics state changes materially.

Zone positioning
Use accumulation to prepare the long case, then wait for confirmation

After accumulation, 100.0% of completed 12-week outcomes were higher across 3 cases. Distinct visits lasted 1.3 weeks on average before leaving the zone.

ApproachBuild the thesis and entry conditions while price is in accumulation. Increase exposure only when price responds; location alone is not the entry.

Review the case whenA failed price response or renewed weakness removes the reason to increase long exposure.

Disagreement playbook
Use improving Market Dynamics to prepare, not anticipate

Comparable disagreements produced an average recovery of 12.5% across 3 completed cases, with the largest move arriving after 5.3 weeks on average.

ApproachDefine the price level that would confirm the repair. Until that response occurs, keep the idea at watchlist or starter-position size.

Review the case whenThe early repair fails if Market Dynamics fades before price responds.

Historical outcomes describe this ticker's completed record. They do not make the next move certain and are not trading instructions.

Adaptive evidence set

The charts that matter to this tape now

This is not a fixed indicator wall. The price anchor is retained for context; the remaining panels are selected dynamically according to the conditions visible in this ticker.

79 observations displayed
6 views selected
Price structureAligned downwardcompleted-week alignment
Momentum37.2Negative
Risk pressure8.8%Normal
Trend quality19.5Range-led
Range position25%location inside observed range
Adaptive set6 viewsselected for the current tape

Price architecture

Trend, acceptance and volatility envelope

Price is shown against fast and slow trend references with its current volatility envelope.

Why this view is active

Selected as the anchor because price and its trend references are aligned downward.

Relative leadership

Strength versus the research benchmark

Relative performance is separated from absolute price direction to reveal leadership and lagging pressure.

Why this view is active

Selected because benchmark-relative leadership is strengthening, fading or diverging from price.

Path risk

Drawdown and recovery pressure

Capital impairment and recovery are shown together so return is not separated from path difficulty.

Why this view is active

Selected because the current recovery or drawdown path is central to the tape.

Participation

Activity pressure and cumulative balance

Observed activity is compared with its normal backdrop while cumulative balance tracks directional participation.

Why this view is active

Selected because participation is confirming or diverging from the latest price path.

Acceptance map

Range position and boundary pressure

Price location inside its observed range shows whether the tape is pressing an outer boundary or rotating through value.

Why this view is active

Selected because price is testing an observed boundary or moving rapidly through its recent range.

Risk geometry

Range pressure and compression

Movement pressure and envelope width show whether risk is expanding, settling or compressed.

Why this view is active

Selected because current variability is unusually compressed or expanded versus this ticker's own tape.

Sharemaestro tape intelligence

What the gauges support now

One assessment resolves price structure and Market Dynamics. The supporting views show the control, force, direction and confidence behind it.

100/100 evidence depth
observed participation included
Joint downward confirmation The gauges support the downward market view

Price structure and Market Dynamics agree. Control, force and direction support the same downward assessment.

SM Consensus Gauge-36.7

Joint downward confirmation

SM Control Gauge-31.3

Seller control supports the view

SM Force Gauge-26.9

Downward commitment

SM Direction Gauge-49.8

Downward follow-through

SM Confirmation Gauge88/100

Strong support

SM consensus path · Market Dynamics display window

SM Consensus Gauge against price

The bars show the direction and strength of the resolved assessment. Completed price is retained as context.

Latest -36.7
Joint downward confirmation
Supportive consensus Cautious consensus Weekly close Neutral

Control

SM Control Gauge

Shows whether buyer or seller control supports the current assessment and whether that support is strengthening or easing.

Current controlSeller control supports the viewRecent pathBroadly stableLatest 12 months
Buyer controlSeller controlBalanced

Commitment

SM Force Gauge

Shows the strength of market commitment behind the current assessment.

Current forceDownward commitmentRecent pathCommitment is easingLatest 12 months
Positive forceNegative forceActivity intensity

Direction and follow-through

SM Direction Gauge

Shows the directional follow-through behind the current assessment and whether it is established or still developing.

Current directionDownward follow-throughFollow-throughUnsettledLatest 12 months
Advancing directionDeclining directionFollow-through

Assessment strength

SM Confirmation Gauge

Shows how firmly the current assessment is supported. Greater assessment risk reduces the weight of the conclusion.

ConfirmationStrong supportAssessment riskContainedLatest 12 months
SM Confirmation GaugeAssessment risk
Interpretation boundary

These charts describe completed market observations and can lag or reverse. The SM gauges provide one confirmation layer; differences in the underlying evidence reduce confirmation rather than create another competing view. Market Dynamics is proprietary Sharemaestro output: this page presents only its published values and plain-language context. Its construction and inputs remain private.

Evidence context