Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/1f7f18ac-1190-456b-984c-66d9c93b3d95/
TRVC
Citigroup Inc.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
11.2%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 65%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 2.44
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
64.0%ile
P/E
12.3×
P/S
2.2×
P/B
0.9×
E/P
0.0816
FCF Yield
-0.196
SH Yield
0.112
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
33.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
23.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
25.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-19.6%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
7.0%ile
ROE
0.076
ROA
0.006
Net Margin
0.182
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.056
Earn Growth
0.212
Stability
0.294
lower=better
Accruals
0.017
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
89.0%ile
6M Return
24.6%
12M Return
72.8%
12-1 Mom
64.7%
Risk-Adj
2.44
Vol 252d
26.5%
Vol 60d
60.9%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-12.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 65% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 2.44 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (61%) is expanding vs long-term (26%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.7
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 94 peers
Sector Value %ile
54.7%
Sector Quality %ile
9.5%
P/E z-score
-0.30
P/B z-score
-0.31
Sector Avg OS
56.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (64th value) but weak quality (7th). Classic value trap risk.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (61%) significantly exceeds 252-day (26%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
69.9% avg (6 factors)
Quality
D
38.8% avg (4 factors)
Momentum
A
88.6% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
72.6% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.700 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.640 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.070 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.890 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 3.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.727 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.265 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
12.25
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0816
Price / Sales
2.23
Price / Book
0.93
FCF Yield
-19.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.4629
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
11.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
7.6%
Return on Assets
0.6%
Net Margin
18.2%
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.017
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.011
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
24.6%
12M Return
72.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
64.7%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
2.44
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
5.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
21.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.294
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
2.8%
Buyback Yield
8.5%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
33
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
23
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
25
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity