62/100
+3.5 points vs screen median
Strong in 0% of 17 observed editionsImproving combined scores / HBP / Company ReportOpen chart terminal ↗
Sharemaestro company report · Improving combined scores · TOR
Helix BioPharma Corp.
HBP · The selected case has incomplete evidence
1 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.
Factor edition25 Sep 2026
Weekly chart through2026-09-25
Company inputs through30 Apr 2026
Factor coverage42%
The selected research question · Improving combined scores
Is the improvement broadening?
An improving combined score is more useful when several pillars improve together. Check what changed and whether the company period changed too.
Breadth behind the score
The selected case has incomplete evidence
Some core readings or input coverage are missing or limited. The selected screen can still have a result, but the wider company interpretation needs more evidence.
Latest change: 5 improving, 0 weakening and 0 unchanged across the 5 comparable focus pillars since the previous edition.
2/5 strong
Focus pillars with standing ≥65. This is a breadth check, not a new combined score.63/100
+5.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 0% of 17 observed editions64/100
+5.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 0% of 17 observed editions65/100
+9.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 18% of 17 observed editions65/100
+5.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 6% of 17 observed editionsThe comparison uses companies qualifying for this screen in the same universe and edition. Medians require at least five companies. Historical strength counts actual factor observations; it does not claim historical screen membership.
01 · The company in perspective
The shape of the evidence
Current research reading
Partial evidence
The available record does not support a complete comparison.
Review coverage before relying on the combined score.
Strongest pillar
Growth
65/100 standing
Weakest pillar
Value
62/100 standing
The strongest and weakest pillars describe this profile, not changes in company performance. The history below shows whether the readings are improving.
02 · Market confirmation
Is the price supporting the case?
Trend SignalNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Market DynamicsPositivelatest completed chart observation
Relative StrengthNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Price / Fair Value-22.5%positive is above the reference
03 · What is changing
A strong reading matters more when it lasts.
Factor standing, one edition at a time
Read across for persistence. Read down for breadth. Each cell is an actual published observation.
80–9965–7940–640–39No reading
| Factor | 7 Jun2026 | 14 Jun2026 | 21 Jun2026 | 28 Jun2026 | 5 Jul2026 | 12 Jul2026 | 19 Jul2026 | 26 Jul2026 | 2 Aug2026 | 9 Aug2026 | 16 Aug2026 | 23 Aug2026 | 30 Aug2026 | 4 Sep2026 | 11 Sep2026 | 18 Sep2026 | 25 Sep2026 | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CombinedFocus | 77 | +37.0points | |||||||||||||||||
| ValueFocus | 62 | +18.0points | |||||||||||||||||
| Business strengthFocus | 63 | +18.0points | |||||||||||||||||
| Price strengthFocus | 64 | +18.0points | |||||||||||||||||
| GrowthFocus | 65 | +18.0points | |||||||||||||||||
| Capital returnFocus | 65 | +18.0points |
Hover or focus a cell to inspect its dated reading. Arrow keys move between factors and editions. Scroll across for more dates.
Changes since the previous edition
Value+18.0 pts44 → 62
Business strength+18.0 pts45 → 63
Price strength+18.0 pts46 → 64
Growth+18.0 pts47 → 65
Capital return+18.0 pts47 → 65
Changes compare 18 Sep 2026 with 25 Sep 2026. The underlying company period did not change between these editions. Prices, peer rankings and other inputs can still move the scores. Changes in a relative score do not, by themselves, identify a cause.
04 · Competitive position
Company strength, in its peer context
Value and Business strength
HBP is highlighted against companies in the Improving combined scores screen. Select a point to compare the same research angle. Up to 250 companies shown.
Has price kept pace?
Price returns to 25 Sep 2026. The comparison is the median of companies in the same sector with a reading, not a traded portfolio.
3 monthsHBP-29.0%Sector median0.0%Difference-29.0 pp
6 monthsHBP-44.0%Sector median9.0%Difference-53.0 pp
12 monthsHBP-35.2%Sector median-3.7%Difference-31.6 pp
Relative standing is the useful comparison.
A rising share price can still trail its peers. A company with falling prices can still outperform a weaker sector. Compare the return gap with the factor profile before drawing a conclusion.
At least five sector observations are required to display a median. Returns exclude dividends. These are completed historical returns, not forward estimates.
05 · Staying power and price risk
Separate company standing from the ride.
Combined factor standing · strong editions18%score ≥65 in 17 observed editions
Annualised volatility74.0%stored one-year daily measure · factor date
Input coverage42%available factor inputs, not certainty
Drawdown measures the weekly close below its running high within the displayed price history. It starts at zero and is not an all-time drawdown. Persistence counts observed editions only; missing weeks are not filled in.
06 · Research playbook
What would strengthen — or weaken — this reading?
Several pillars strengthen together
Compare changes across all five perspectives; watch for new company inputs and loss of price support.
1 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.
The score depends on fewer strong pillars
Value is the weakest measured focus pillar at 62/100. Check whether it is recovering, stable or deteriorating in the history above.
A loss of screen qualification, lower coverage or deterioration across several readings would require a fresh review.
Keep the research question consistent
Compare HBP with other companies selected by Improving combined scores. A stronger overall score does not necessarily mean stronger evidence for this particular approach.
Open this screen →Screen membership
Where HBP qualifies
A traceable Sharemaestro report
Built from the record we have.
This report uses published Sharemaestro factor snapshots and stored completed weekly prices and indicators. Company inputs are translated into comparable standing, change and context. The page does not fetch live accounts or infer missing company results.
Scores use the established higher-is-stronger Sharemaestro display convention and are relative to Canada - CAD. Sector medians compare those same universe scores; they do not re-rank the company. Peer medians exclude missing readings.
The company period is the period end used in the factor edition, not its filing date. Stored history is an observation record, not a claim of a point-in-time investable backtest. None of these scores is a probability or expected return.
Historical price series may reflect provider adjustments. The combined score is a summary, not a substitute for the distinct strengths, weaknesses and data coverage shown above.