Sharemaestro company report · Shareholder Yield · TOR

Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust

AP-UN · Read the backing, as well as the return

0 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive. The company ranking and the current market picture disagree.

The selected research question · Shareholder Yield

Are capital returns backed by the business?

Look beyond the distribution itself: examine cash backing, financial resilience and business strength, then check whether price weakness is dominating the picture.

Capital return with support

Read the backing, as well as the return

Financial resilience is the weakest measured cash-research component. A high aggregate does not remove that weakness.

Latest change: 4 improving, 0 weakening and 0 unchanged across the 4 comparable focus pillars since the previous edition.

0/4 strong
Focus pillars with standing ≥65. This is a breadth check, not a new combined score.
Capital return
62/100

+13.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 88% of 17 observed editions
Business strength
60/100

+10.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 88% of 17 observed editions
Value
59/100

+10.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 88% of 17 observed editions
Growth
62/100

+12.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 6% of 17 observed editions

The comparison uses companies qualifying for this screen in the same universe and edition. Medians require at least five companies. Historical strength counts actual factor observations; it does not claim historical screen membership.

01 · The company in perspective

The shape of the evidence

Higher means stronger relative standing.
Value59/100
-5.0 points vs Real Estate median
Business strength60/100
+21.0 points vs Real Estate median
Price strength61/100
+33.0 points vs Real Estate median
Growth62/100
+34.0 points vs Real Estate median
Capital return62/100
-19.0 points vs Real Estate median

Vertical marks show the peer median · 49 company records in the comparison.

Current research reading

A selective picture

The factor profile contains a mix of stronger and weaker readings.

Start with the strongest pillar and test the weakest part of the case.

Strongest pillar

Growth

62/100 standing

Weakest pillar

Value

59/100 standing

The strongest and weakest pillars describe this profile, not changes in company performance. The history below shows whether the readings are improving.

Beneath the factor profile

How well does the business support the score?

Derived from the saved company inputs · 25 Sep 2026
Cash value34/100
Cash backing54/100
Business durability73/100
Financial resilience18/100
Capital discipline67/100
Price support22/100

These established Sharemaestro cash-research scores summarise cash backing, durability, resilience and capital discipline. Higher is stronger on the available tests. They are separate from universe ranks and are not percentiles or probabilities. Missing components remain unavailable.

02 · Market confirmation

Is the price supporting the case?

Full chart terminal ↗
Trend SignalNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Market DynamicsNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Relative StrengthNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Price / Fair Value-45.2%positive is above the reference

03 · What is changing

A strong reading matters more when it lasts.

7 Jun 2026 – 25 Sep 2026
Factor standing, one edition at a time

Read across for persistence. Read down for breadth. Each cell is an actual published observation.

80–9965–7940–640–39No reading
Company factor history. Higher scores mean stronger standing in the comparison universe.
Factor7 Jun202614 Jun202621 Jun202628 Jun20265 Jul202612 Jul202619 Jul202626 Jul20262 Aug20269 Aug202616 Aug202623 Aug202630 Aug20264 Sep202611 Sep202618 Sep202625 Sep2026LatestChange
CombinedFocus72+3.0points
Capital returnFocus62+2.0points
Business strengthFocus60+2.0points
ValueFocus59+1.0points
GrowthFocus62+2.0points
Price strengthFurther context61+2.0points

Hover or focus a cell to inspect its dated reading. Arrow keys move between factors and editions. Scroll across for more dates.

Changes since the previous edition
Business strength+2.0 pts58 → 60
Price strength+2.0 pts59 → 61
Growth+2.0 pts60 → 62
Capital return+2.0 pts60 → 62
Value+1.0 pts58 → 59

Changes compare 18 Sep 2026 with 25 Sep 2026. The underlying company period did not change between these editions. Prices, peer rankings and other inputs can still move the scores. Changes in a relative score do not, by themselves, identify a cause.

04 · Competitive position

Company strength, in its peer context

Explore Real Estate ↗

Capital return and Business strength

AP-UN is highlighted against companies in the Shareholder Yield screen. Select a point to compare the same research angle. Up to 250 companies shown.

Has price kept pace?

Price returns to 25 Sep 2026. The comparison is the median of companies in the same sector with a reading, not a traded portfolio.

3 monthsAP-UN-24.4%Sector median-7.3%Difference-17.2 pp
6 monthsAP-UN-16.3%Sector median0.3%Difference-16.6 pp
12 monthsAP-UN-62.5%Sector median-0.3%Difference-62.2 pp

Relative standing is the useful comparison.

A rising share price can still trail its peers. A company with falling prices can still outperform a weaker sector. Compare the return gap with the factor profile before drawing a conclusion.

At least five sector observations are required to display a median. Returns exclude dividends. These are completed historical returns, not forward estimates.

05 · Staying power and price risk

Separate company standing from the ride.

Strong factor evidence does not remove price risk.
Capital return · strong editions88%score ≥65 in 17 observed editions
Annualised volatility47.5%stored one-year daily measure · factor date
Input coverage79%available factor inputs, not certainty

Drawdown measures the weekly close below its running high within the displayed price history. It starts at zero and is not an all-time drawdown. Persistence counts observed editions only; missing weeks are not filled in.

06 · Research playbook

What would strengthen — or weaken — this reading?

Conditions to monitor, not a trade instruction.
Build the Shareholder Yield case

Capital return is backed by resilient cash generation

Review the capital-discipline and cash-backing scores alongside business strength and the next company period.

0 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive. The company ranking and the current market picture disagree.

Challenge the case

Cash backing or business strength weakens

Value is the weakest measured focus pillar at 59/100. Check whether it is recovering, stable or deteriorating in the history above.

A loss of screen qualification, lower coverage or deterioration across several readings would require a fresh review.

Compare the alternatives

Keep the research question consistent

Compare AP-UN with other companies selected by Shareholder Yield. A stronger overall score does not necessarily mean stronger evidence for this particular approach.

Open this screen →

Screen membership

Where AP-UN qualifies

The same selection rules used by the Company Screener.

A traceable Sharemaestro report

Built from the record we have.

This report uses published Sharemaestro factor snapshots and stored completed weekly prices and indicators. Company inputs are translated into comparable standing, change and context. The page does not fetch live accounts or infer missing company results.

Scores use the established higher-is-stronger Sharemaestro display convention and are relative to Canada - CAD. Sector medians compare those same universe scores; they do not re-rank the company. Peer medians exclude missing readings.

The company period is the period end used in the factor edition, not its filing date. Stored history is an observation record, not a claim of a point-in-time investable backtest. None of these scores is a probability or expected return.

Historical price series may reflect provider adjustments. The combined score is a summary, not a substitute for the distinct strengths, weaknesses and data coverage shown above.

Evidence context