Sharemaestro company report · Shareholder Yield · TOR

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II

DF · The selected case has incomplete evidence

2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.

The selected research question · Shareholder Yield

Are capital returns backed by the business?

Look beyond the distribution itself: examine cash backing, financial resilience and business strength, then check whether price weakness is dominating the picture.

Capital return with support

The selected case has incomplete evidence

Some core readings or input coverage are missing or limited. The selected screen can still have a result, but the wider company interpretation needs more evidence.

Latest change: 4 improving, 0 weakening and 0 unchanged across the 4 comparable focus pillars since the previous edition.

0/4 strong
Focus pillars with standing ≥65. This is a breadth check, not a new combined score.
Capital return
56/100

+7.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 29% of 17 observed editions
Business strength
54/100

+4.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 0% of 17 observed editions
Value
53/100

+4.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 29% of 17 observed editions
Growth
56/100

+6.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 24% of 17 observed editions

The comparison uses companies qualifying for this screen in the same universe and edition. Medians require at least five companies. Historical strength counts actual factor observations; it does not claim historical screen membership.

01 · The company in perspective

The shape of the evidence

Higher means stronger relative standing.
Value53/100
-8.0 points vs Financial Services median
Business strength54/100
+7.0 points vs Financial Services median
Price strength55/100
+1.0 points vs Financial Services median
Growth56/100
+4.0 points vs Financial Services median
Capital return56/100
-1.0 points vs Financial Services median

Vertical marks show the peer median · 83 company records in the comparison.

Current research reading

Partial evidence

The available record does not support a complete comparison.

Review coverage before relying on the combined score.

Strongest pillar

Growth

56/100 standing

Weakest pillar

Value

53/100 standing

The strongest and weakest pillars describe this profile, not changes in company performance. The history below shows whether the readings are improving.

02 · Market confirmation

Is the price supporting the case?

Full chart terminal ↗
Trend SignalPositivelatest completed chart observation
Market DynamicsNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Relative StrengthPositivelatest completed chart observation
Price / Fair Value+68.5%positive is above the reference

03 · What is changing

A strong reading matters more when it lasts.

7 Jun 2026 – 25 Sep 2026
Factor standing, one edition at a time

Read across for persistence. Read down for breadth. Each cell is an actual published observation.

80–9965–7940–640–39No reading
Company factor history. Higher scores mean stronger standing in the comparison universe.
Factor7 Jun202614 Jun202621 Jun202628 Jun20265 Jul202612 Jul202619 Jul202626 Jul20262 Aug20269 Aug202616 Aug202623 Aug202630 Aug20264 Sep202611 Sep202618 Sep202625 Sep2026LatestChange
CombinedFocus59+10.0points
Capital returnFocus56+5.0points
Business strengthFocus54+5.0points
ValueFocus53+5.0points
GrowthFocus56+5.0points
Price strengthFurther context55+5.0points

Hover or focus a cell to inspect its dated reading. Arrow keys move between factors and editions. Scroll across for more dates.

Changes since the previous edition
Value+5.0 pts48 → 53
Business strength+5.0 pts49 → 54
Price strength+5.0 pts50 → 55
Growth+5.0 pts51 → 56
Capital return+5.0 pts51 → 56

Changes compare 18 Sep 2026 with 25 Sep 2026. The underlying company period did not change between these editions. Prices, peer rankings and other inputs can still move the scores. Changes in a relative score do not, by themselves, identify a cause.

04 · Competitive position

Company strength, in its peer context

Explore Financial Services ↗

Capital return and Business strength

DF is highlighted against companies in the Shareholder Yield screen. Select a point to compare the same research angle. Up to 250 companies shown.

Has price kept pace?

Price returns to 25 Sep 2026. The comparison is the median of companies in the same sector with a reading, not a traded portfolio.

3 monthsDF+0.7%Sector median0.3%Difference+0.4 pp
6 monthsDF+23.2%Sector median12.8%Difference+10.4 pp
12 monthsDF+44.6%Sector median23.7%Difference+20.9 pp

Relative standing is the useful comparison.

A rising share price can still trail its peers. A company with falling prices can still outperform a weaker sector. Compare the return gap with the factor profile before drawing a conclusion.

At least five sector observations are required to display a median. Returns exclude dividends. These are completed historical returns, not forward estimates.

05 · Staying power and price risk

Separate company standing from the ride.

Strong factor evidence does not remove price risk.
Capital return · strong editions29%score ≥65 in 17 observed editions
Annualised volatility14.9%stored one-year daily measure · factor date
Input coverage39%available factor inputs, not certainty

Drawdown measures the weekly close below its running high within the displayed price history. It starts at zero and is not an all-time drawdown. Persistence counts observed editions only; missing weeks are not filled in.

06 · Research playbook

What would strengthen — or weaken — this reading?

Conditions to monitor, not a trade instruction.
Build the Shareholder Yield case

Capital return is backed by resilient cash generation

Review the capital-discipline and cash-backing scores alongside business strength and the next company period.

2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.

Challenge the case

Cash backing or business strength weakens

Value is the weakest measured focus pillar at 53/100. Check whether it is recovering, stable or deteriorating in the history above.

A loss of screen qualification, lower coverage or deterioration across several readings would require a fresh review.

Compare the alternatives

Keep the research question consistent

Compare DF with other companies selected by Shareholder Yield. A stronger overall score does not necessarily mean stronger evidence for this particular approach.

Open this screen →

Screen membership

Where DF qualifies

The same selection rules used by the Company Screener.

A traceable Sharemaestro report

Built from the record we have.

This report uses published Sharemaestro factor snapshots and stored completed weekly prices and indicators. Company inputs are translated into comparable standing, change and context. The page does not fetch live accounts or infer missing company results.

Scores use the established higher-is-stronger Sharemaestro display convention and are relative to Canada - CAD. Sector medians compare those same universe scores; they do not re-rank the company. Peer medians exclude missing readings.

The company period is the period end used in the factor edition, not its filing date. Stored history is an observation record, not a claim of a point-in-time investable backtest. None of these scores is a probability or expected return.

Historical price series may reflect provider adjustments. The combined score is a summary, not a substitute for the distinct strengths, weaknesses and data coverage shown above.

Evidence context