Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f3f230e8-d728-4656-b206-fb52c0ad4117/

MTLA

Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Chart
€353.50
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.25
OS Score
9.0%
Value
89.0%
Quality
49.0%
Momentum
6/9
F-Score
0.283
QV
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
2.7%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
9.0%ile
P/E
28.1×
P/S
5.0×
P/B
23.1×
E/P
0.0356
FCF Yield
0.037
EBITDA/EV
0.053
SH Yield
0.027
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
92.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
89.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
90.00000000
/100
VC2 score of 89.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
89.0%ile
ROE
0.822
ROA
0.110
Net Margin
0.176
Op Margin
0.248
GPA
0.320
Current
1.07
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.080
Earn Growth
0.377
Stability
0.220
lower=better
Accruals
-0.036
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 82% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
49.0%ile
6M Return
11.7%
Vol 252d
21.7%
Vol 60d
47.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-16.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (48%) is expanding vs long-term (22%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.25
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 121 peers
Sector Value %ile
28.7%
Sector Quality %ile
77.9%
P/E z-score
-0.16
P/B z-score
1.77
Sector Avg OS
38.0%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ERCB Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) 99.0% 99.0% 87.0% 93.0%
ERCG Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) 99.0% 99.0% 86.0% 92.0%
V6C Viscom SE 85.0% 78.0% 32.0% 85.0%
CSH CENIT Aktiengesellschaft 85.0% 91.0% 66.0% 22.0%
BKHT Brockhaus Technologies AG 84.0% 67.0% 61.0% 74.0%
HRPK 7C Solarparken AG 83.0% 78.0% 82.0% 29.0%
TPG0 The Platform Group SE & Co. KGaA 83.0% 99.0% 67.0% 0.0%
AEIN Allgeier SE 82.0% 92.0% 59.0% 18.0%
Factor Interactions
Quality at a Premium
High quality (89th) but expensive (9th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (48%) significantly exceeds 252-day (22%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
35.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
68.1% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
C
52.1% avg (1 factors)
Risk
A
80.5% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.250—1
Value %ile0.090—1
Quality %ile0.890—1
Momentum %ile0.490—0
F-Score6.000—0
Confidence0.879—1
Volatility0.217—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
28.11
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0356
Price / Sales
4.95
Price / Book
23.09
Price / Cash Flow
21.15
FCF Yield
3.7%
EBITDA / EV
5.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1759
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
2.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
82.2%
Return on Assets
11.0%
Net Margin
17.6%
Operating Margin
24.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
32.0%
Current Ratio
1.07
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.036
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.048
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
11.7%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
8.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
37.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.220
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
1.3%
Buyback Yield
1.4%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
92
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
89
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
90
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity