IRM · Iron Mountain Incorporated

Iron Mountain stands out in Specialty REITs as a 30.9% quarter meets muted volume

IRM closed 4.0% below its 52-week high with an active Trend Signal, positive Market Dynamics and Relative Strength, but participation remains below its recent average.

Week of 19 Jun 2026

Price and trend

What changed, and whether the move is confirmed

Weekly price is shown against Sharemaestro’s Trend Line and Fair Value, with participation and market leadership alongside it.

52-week history

Price, trend, and Fair Value

Latest
127.8 USD
vs Trend
22.5%
vs Fair Value
46.0%

The price chart compares weekly close with the Trend Line and Fair Value. IRM is shown at 22.5% versus the Trend Line and 46.0% versus Fair Value.

Price Trend Line Fair Value
52 weeks agoLatest week
Participation and leadership

Market Dynamics and Relative Strength

Pressure
1.15
Leadership
14.97

The pressure chart tracks Market Dynamics and Relative Strength together. The latest readings are - for Market Dynamics and - for Relative Strength, with four-week changes of - and -, respectively.

Market Dynamics Relative Strength
52 weeks agoLatest week
Weekly participation

Trading volume

Latest
6.3M
13W avg
7.1M
Ratio
0.9x

The volume profile shows weekly participation across the one-year window. Latest volume is 6.3M versus a 13-week average of 7.1M and a 52-week average of 8.2M.

52 weeks agoLatest week

Price position

Where the shares stand

  • Range location: 90.5%. Shows where the latest close sits between the 52-week low and high.
  • Trend distance: 22.5%. Price premium or discount versus the weekly Trend Line.
  • Fair-value gap: 46.0%. Premium demand or model discount versus Sharemaestro Fair Value.
  • High-water gap: -4.0%. Distance from the latest 52-week high.

Trading activity

Whether volume confirms the move

  • Participation: 0.9x. Latest volume versus the 13-week average.
  • Baseline: 7.1M. 13-week average volume.
  • One-year base: 8.2M. 52-week average volume.

Next checks

What investors should watch

  • Price is close to its 52-week high; watch for continuation or exhaustion.
  • Trend Line remains the key weekly regime level.
  • Activity pressure is the gauge to monitor for confirmation or fade.
  • A volume ratio above 1.5x would show stronger participation in the next move.

At a glance

Summary

Audio summaryA short spoken overview of the main findings.

Iron Mountain ended the week at $127.8, up 1.2%, keeping a 17-week active Trend Signal intact and extending a strong 12-week gain of 30.9%. The stock is 22.5% above its weekly Trend Line and 46.0% above Sharemaestro Fair Value, a premium that confirms demand but also reduces valuation cushion. Volume was the main caveat, at 6.3 million shares, or 0.9 times the 13-week average.

  • IRM gained 1.2% for the week and is up 30.9% over 12 weeks, with a 62.0% 26-week return.
  • The close at $127.8 sits 90.5% through the 52-week range and 4.0% below the $133.2 high.
  • The Trend Signal is active for a 17th week, with price 22.5% above the $104.4 Trend Line.
  • Volume was 6.3 million shares, below the 7.1 million 13-week average and 8.2 million 52-week average.
  • Specialty REIT breadth is constructive on trend and Market Dynamics, but Relative Strength breadth is thin at 21.1%.

Company analysis

The move in context

Weekly price action keeps the signal constructive

Iron Mountain finished the week ended 19 June at $127.8, up 1.2%, adding modest follow-through after a 1.8% four-week gain. The larger move remains the story: the stock is up 30.9% over 12 weeks, 62.0% over 26 weeks and 30.4% over the past year. That keeps the setup in continuation mode rather than a fresh reversal phase.

The weekly Trend Signal remains active, now in a 17-week streak. Price is 22.5% above the $104.4 Trend Line, while Trend Breadth is 57.7%, with 30 of the last 52 weeks active. Sharemaestro’s Expectancy Model is positive at 57.33%, and the composite score stands at 71, supporting the view that the move remains technically intact even as short-term gains have moderated.

Sector and industry context favour IRM, but breadth is selective

IRM’s weekly gain stood out against a soft Real Estate sector, where the average stock fell 2.49% for the week. Sector conditions are mixed but not weak: 62.0% of Real Estate names have active weekly trend signals and 69.0% show positive Market Dynamics, while only 26.0% carry positive Relative Strength. IRM has all three boxes checked, which places it in the stronger part of the sector group.

Within US REIT - Specialty, the average weekly return was -0.78%, with 68.4% trend breadth and 73.7% positive Market Dynamics. Relative Strength breadth is thinner at 21.1%, making IRM’s positive RS reading more meaningful. The stock ranked fifth in the 19-name industry over one week and four weeks, and third over 12 weeks, while sitting in the 79th percentile among 252 US Real Estate peers.

Premium valuation and lighter volume temper the evidence

The price location is strong but increasingly extended. IRM is 90.5% through its 52-week range, only 4.0% below the $133.2 high, and well above the $76.63 annual low. It also trades 46.0% above Sharemaestro Fair Value of $87.55. That premium reflects persistent demand, but it leaves less room for disappointment if the weekly move loses sponsorship.

Volume does not yet confirm a forceful new leg. Latest turnover was 6.3 million shares, equal to 0.9 times the 13-week average of 7.1 million and 0.8 times the 52-week average of 8.2 million. Activity pressure is positive at 1.15, but it has fallen 26.6% over four weeks and there is no fresh buy signal from that component. Relative leadership improved 9.5% over four weeks to 14.97, so the evidence is constructive, but not one-sided.

Risk and what to watch next

Recent volatility is contained relative to the one-year base, with 13-week weekly-return volatility at 3.8% versus 4.4% over 52 weeks. The up/down split is favourable at 29 positive weeks against 23 negative weeks, and the average positive week of 3.5% has exceeded the average negative week of -3.0%. Still, the presence of 11 recent reversal markers in the smart-money tape argues against complacency near the high.

The next test is whether IRM can press through the high-water area with stronger participation. A volume ratio above 1.5 times would give the move better confirmation, while a fade in activity pressure would make the 22.5% distance above the Trend Line more relevant as a risk marker. The Trend Line remains the main weekly regime level, but the immediate question is whether near-high price action can attract broader volume rather than simply drift on existing momentum.

Peer comparison

How the wider group is behaving

Breadth shows how much of the sector or industry is participating. A company move is more convincing when its peers are improving too.

US Real Estate

100 tracked companies

Above Trend Line62.0%

Positive Relative Strength26.0%

US Reit - Specialty

19 tracked companies

Above Trend Line68.4%

Positive Relative Strength21.1%

Balanced view

What supports the case, and what could weaken it

What is working

  • The trend backdrop is active with a 17-week active streak.
  • Price is above the Trend Line, keeping the weekly tape constructive.
  • Price is above Fair Value, showing premium demand versus the model.
  • Activity pressure is positive on the latest completed week.
  • The Expectancy Model is positive at 57.33%, strengthening the forward tape read.

What needs caution

  • 11 reversal markers appear in the recent smart-money tape.

Research note

This article is for educational market research only and is not financial, investment, trading, tax, or legal advice. Sharemaestro does not make buy, sell, or hold recommendations.

Source and attribution

Source: Sharemaestro. Canonical article: https://sharemaestro.com/news/irm-specialty-reit-quarter-muted-volume/.

Follow new Sharemaestro research through the RSS feed or JSON feed.

Continue your research

Explore IRM across Sharemaestro

Open the pages backed by current data for this company. Each link takes you directly to the relevant analysis.

Evidence context