JHX · James Hardie Industries PLC ADR

James Hardie’s 38% quarter climb runs ahead of a thin Building Materials signal base

The ADR added 3.1% in the latest week and has recovered sharply over 12 weeks, but the weekly Trend Signal remains inactive and industry breadth is still narrow.

Week of 19 Jun 2026

Price and trend

What changed, and whether the move is confirmed

Weekly price is shown against Sharemaestro’s Trend Line and Fair Value, with participation and market leadership alongside it.

52-week history

Price, trend, and Fair Value

Latest
24.87 USD
vs Trend
14.2%
vs Fair Value
-13.7%

The price chart compares weekly close with the Trend Line and Fair Value. JHX is shown at 14.2% versus the Trend Line and -13.7% versus Fair Value.

Price Trend Line Fair Value
52 weeks agoLatest week
Participation and leadership

Market Dynamics and Relative Strength

Pressure
0.92
Leadership
0.71

The pressure chart tracks Market Dynamics and Relative Strength together. The latest readings are - for Market Dynamics and - for Relative Strength, with four-week changes of - and -, respectively.

Market Dynamics Relative Strength
52 weeks agoLatest week
Weekly participation

Trading volume

Latest
43.4M
13W avg
36.3M
Ratio
1.2x

The volume profile shows weekly participation across the one-year window. Latest volume is 43.4M versus a 13-week average of 36.3M and a 52-week average of 34.6M.

52 weeks agoLatest week

Price position

Where the shares stand

  • Range location: 62.9%. Shows where the latest close sits between the 52-week low and high.
  • Trend distance: 14.2%. Price premium or discount versus the weekly Trend Line.
  • Fair-value gap: -13.7%. Premium demand or model discount versus Sharemaestro Fair Value.
  • High-water gap: -16.6%. Distance from the latest 52-week high.

Trading activity

Whether volume confirms the move

  • Participation: 1.2x. Latest volume versus the 13-week average.
  • Baseline: 36.3M. 13-week average volume.
  • One-year base: 34.6M. 52-week average volume.

Next checks

What investors should watch

  • Trend Line remains the key weekly regime level.
  • Activity pressure is the gauge to monitor for confirmation or fade.
  • A volume ratio above 1.5x would show stronger participation in the next move.

At a glance

Summary

Audio summaryA short spoken overview of the main findings.

James Hardie Industries PLC ADR closed at 24.87 USD for the week ended 19 June 2026, up 3.1% on 43.4M shares. The move adds to a 19.8% four-week gain and a 38.0% 12-week advance, putting JHX well ahead of broader US Basic Materials momentum, though the setup remains balanced rather than fully confirmed.

  • JHX closed 14.2% above its 21.78 USD weekly Trend Line, but the Trend backdrop is inactive and active trend breadth is only 4 of 52 weeks.
  • Volume improved to 43.4M shares, equal to 1.2x the 13-week average and 1.3x the 52-week average, confirming participation but not a full reset.
  • The stock remains 13.7% below Sharemaestro Fair Value at 28.81 USD and 16.6% under its 52-week high of 29.82 USD.
  • Building Materials context is mixed: the industry gained 4.7% for the week, ahead of JHX, while JHX’s 19.8% four-week return beats the industry’s 12.5% average.

Company analysis

The move in context

Weekly move adds to a sharp recovery

James Hardie Industries PLC ADR finished the latest completed week at 24.87 USD, gaining 3.1%. The larger story is the recovery arc: JHX is up 19.8% over four weeks and 38.0% over 12 weeks, a strong rebound for a 13.2B USD Building Materials name after earlier weakness in the spring.

Price now sits at 62.9% of its 52-week range, between a low of 16.46 USD and a high of 29.82 USD. The close is comfortably above the 21.78 USD weekly Trend Line, with a 14.2% premium, but it remains 16.6% below the high-water mark and 13.7% below Sharemaestro Fair Value of 28.81 USD.

Sector and industry context is supportive, but not broad

Within US Basic Materials, JHX ranks in the 72.9th percentile of its peer set for the latest weekly read, with the wider group averaging a 1.0% weekly decline across 222 names. The sector picture is better over longer windows: Basic Materials averaged 0.7% over four weeks and 8.5% over 12 weeks, both well below JHX’s 19.8% and 38.0% gains.

The industry comparison is more nuanced. US Building Materials averaged a stronger 4.7% weekly return, so JHX lagged the group for the latest week, but it remains ahead over four and 12 weeks. Industry breadth is still restrained, with only 11.8% of Building Materials names showing active weekly trend signals, 47.1% with positive Market Dynamics, and 29.4% with positive Relative Strength.

Signal state remains balanced rather than decisive

Sharemaestro’s setup signature is a balanced read, with a composite score of 54. The positive evidence is clear: price is above the Trend Line, Market Dynamics activity pressure is positive at 0.92, and Relative Strength has turned positive at 0.71 after being negative in recent weeks.

The constraint is signal quality. The Trend backdrop remains inactive, and active trend breadth for JHX is just 7.7%, equal to 4 active weeks in the past 52. The expectancy read is also undecided at 53.28%, which argues that the recent rebound has improved the tape without yet creating a fully confirmed weekly regime.

Volume confirms interest, while risk remains two-sided

Participation improved to 43.4M shares, above the 13-week average of 36.3M and the 52-week average of 34.6M. The 1.2x volume ratio is constructive, especially after 40.2M shares in the prior up week, but it remains short of the stronger 1.5x threshold that would signal broader conviction.

Risk is not excessive by the stock’s own history, with 13-week weekly-return volatility at 6.3% versus a 52-week base of 7.6%. Still, the distribution is uneven: JHX has logged 29 positive weeks and 23 negative weeks over the past year, while the average losing week at -6.0% is larger than the average gaining week at 5.4%. Sharp losses and strong gains each account for 23.1% of the recent 26-week bucket set.

What to watch next

The key test is whether the move can keep the close above the weekly Trend Line while converting positive pressure into an active Trend backdrop. A sustained activity-pressure read above zero, accompanied by a stronger volume ratio, would improve the quality of confirmation.

On the other side, a fade back toward the 21.78 USD Trend Line would test whether the four-week rebound was a durable base recovery or a fast retracement within an unfinished repair process. The Fair Value gap at 28.81 USD gives the stock room to recover further, but the market has not yet fully endorsed that value with trend confirmation.

Peer comparison

How the wider group is behaving

Breadth shows how much of the sector or industry is participating. A company move is more convincing when its peers are improving too.

US Basic Materials

100 tracked companies

Above Trend Line51.0%

Positive Relative Strength43.0%

US Building Materials

17 tracked companies

Above Trend Line11.8%

Positive Relative Strength29.4%

Balanced view

What supports the case, and what could weaken it

What is working

  • Price is above the Trend Line, keeping the weekly tape constructive.
  • Activity pressure is positive on the latest completed week.

What needs caution

  • The trend backdrop is inactive, so price action has not confirmed a constructive regime.
  • Price is below Fair Value, so the market is still discounting the latest tape.
  • Activity pressure is weak, so confirmation is not yet broad enough.

Research note

This article is for educational market research only and is not financial, investment, trading, tax, or legal advice. Sharemaestro does not make buy, sell, or hold recommendations.

Source and attribution

Source: Sharemaestro. Canonical article: https://sharemaestro.com/news/jhx-quarter-climb-thin-building-materials-signal-base/.

Follow new Sharemaestro research through the RSS feed or JSON feed.

Continue your research

Explore JHX across Sharemaestro

Open the pages backed by current data for this company. Each link takes you directly to the relevant analysis.

Evidence context