Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/07be6865-b2fe-4536-a13f-0b234930ea26/
AXQ
AURACONGRP CDI 1:1 [AXQ]Snapshot 2026-08-02 · 1.4w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.860
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.740
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
75.0%ile
P/S
3.8×
SH Yield
-0.071
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
25.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
26.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
25.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
73.0%ile
ROE
0.408
Net Margin
-0.834
Op Margin
-0.831
GPA
-0.753
Current
-3.30
F-Score
2/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.313
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 41% is exceptional. F-Score of 2/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
74.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-53.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.86
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology
· 133 peers
Sector Value %ile
82.1%
Sector Quality %ile
76.1%
Sector Avg OS
40.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (75th) and quality (73th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (75th value) with strong momentum (74th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
38.2% avg (2 factors)
Quality
F
20.0% avg (5 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.750 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.730 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.740 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 2.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.269 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Sales
3.76
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1576
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-7.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
40.8%
Net Margin
-83.4%
Operating Margin
-83.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
-75.3%
Current Ratio
-3.30
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
31.3%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
2
Buyback Yield
-7.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
25
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
26
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
25
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity