Sharemaestro company report · Price strength relative to volatility · LSE

Saga plc

SAGA · Leadership needs a confirmation check

2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.

Latest completed factor comparison: 25 Sep 2026. Chart evidence is dated separately; price updates do not recalculate this factor edition.

The selected research question · Price strength relative to volatility

How demanding is the ride behind the return?

This screen compares historical price strength with volatility. Check the actual return record, drawdowns and current trend support; the ratio alone is not the conclusion.

Return quality and price risk

Leadership needs a confirmation check

2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive. Compare that latest chart evidence with the older price-strength rank and the actual return path.

Latest change: 0 improving, 1 weakening and 2 unchanged across the 3 comparable focus pillars since the previous edition.

2/3 strong
Focus pillars with standing ≥65. This is a breadth check, not a new combined score.
Price strength
99/100

+49.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 100% of 16 observed editions
Business strength
89/100

+39.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 100% of 16 observed editions
Value
13/100

-37.0 points vs screen median

Strong in 0% of 16 observed editions

The comparison uses companies qualifying for this screen in the same universe and edition. Medians require at least five companies. Historical strength counts actual factor observations; it does not claim historical screen membership.

01 · The company in perspective

The shape of the evidence

Higher means stronger relative standing.
Value13/100
-42.0 points vs Financial Services median
Business strength89/100
+37.0 points vs Financial Services median
Price strength99/100
+46.0 points vs Financial Services median
Growth87/100
+33.0 points vs Financial Services median
Capital return11/100
-48.0 points vs Financial Services median

Vertical marks show the peer median · 181 company records in the comparison.

Current research reading

Price ahead of value

Price leadership comes with a weaker value ranking.

Watch for slowing price strength or improvement in the company record.

Strongest pillar

Price strength

99/100 standing

Weakest pillar

Capital return

11/100 standing

The strongest and weakest pillars describe this profile, not changes in company performance. The history below shows whether the readings are improving.

Beneath the factor profile

How well does the business support the score?

Derived from the saved company inputs · 25 Sep 2026
Cash value62/100
Cash backing75/100
Business durability75/100
Financial resilience15/100
Capital discipline54/100
Price support71/100

These established Sharemaestro cash-research scores summarise cash backing, durability, resilience and capital discipline. Higher is stronger on the available tests. They are separate from universe ranks and are not percentiles or probabilities. Missing components remain unavailable.

02 · The centre of the research case

Is the price supporting the case?

Full chart terminal ↗
Trend SignalPositivelatest completed chart observation
Market DynamicsNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Relative StrengthPositivelatest completed chart observation
Price / Fair Value+196.4%positive is above the reference

03 · What is changing

A strong reading matters more when it lasts.

7 Jun 2026 – 25 Sep 2026
Factor standing, one edition at a time

Read across for persistence. Read down for breadth. Each cell is an actual published observation.

80–9965–7940–640–39No reading
Company factor history. Higher scores mean stronger standing in the comparison universe.
Factor7 Jun202614 Jun202621 Jun202628 Jun20265 Jul202612 Jul202619 Jul202626 Jul20262 Aug20269 Aug202616 Aug202628 Aug20264 Sep202611 Sep202618 Sep202625 Sep2026LatestChange
CombinedFocus580.0points
Price strengthFocus990.0points
Business strengthFocus89-2.0points
ValueFocus130.0points
GrowthFurther context870.0points
Capital returnFurther context110.0points

Hover or focus a cell to inspect its dated reading. Arrow keys move between factors and editions. Scroll across for more dates.

Changes since the previous edition
Business strength-2.0 pts91 → 89
Value0.0 pts13 → 13
Price strength0.0 pts99 → 99
Growth0.0 pts87 → 87
Capital return0.0 pts11 → 11

Changes compare 18 Sep 2026 with 25 Sep 2026. The underlying company period did not change between these editions. Prices, peer rankings and other inputs can still move the scores. Changes in a relative score do not, by themselves, identify a cause.

04 · Competitive position

Company strength, in its peer context

Explore Financial Services ↗

Price strength and Business strength

SAGA is highlighted against companies in the Price strength relative to volatility screen. Select a point to compare the same research angle. Up to 250 companies shown.

Has price kept pace?

Price returns to 25 Sep 2026. The comparison is the median of companies in the same sector with a reading, not a traded portfolio.

3 monthsSAGA+1.3%Sector median0.7%Difference+0.6 pp
6 monthsSAGA+26.9%Sector median6.2%Difference+20.7 pp
12 monthsSAGA+190.6%Sector median1.7%Difference+188.9 pp

Relative standing is the useful comparison.

A rising share price can still trail its peers. A company with falling prices can still outperform a weaker sector. Compare the return gap with the factor profile before drawing a conclusion.

At least five sector observations are required to display a median. Returns exclude dividends. These are completed historical returns, not forward estimates.

05 · Staying power and price risk

Separate company standing from the ride.

Strong factor evidence does not remove price risk.
Price strength · strong editions100%score ≥65 in 16 observed editions
Annualised volatility56.0%stored one-year daily measure · factor date
Input coverage88%available factor inputs, not certainty

Drawdown measures the weekly close below its running high within the displayed price history. It starts at zero and is not an all-time drawdown. Persistence counts observed editions only; missing weeks are not filled in.

06 · Research playbook

What would strengthen — or weaken — this reading?

Conditions to monitor, not a trade instruction.
Build the Price strength relative to volatility case

Price strength persists with controlled setbacks

Compare the latest volatility reading with drawdown behaviour and the strength of the current trend.

2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.

Challenge the case

The return advantage narrows while risk rises

Value is the weakest measured focus pillar at 13/100. Check whether it is recovering, stable or deteriorating in the history above.

A loss of screen qualification, lower coverage or deterioration across several readings would require a fresh review.

Compare the alternatives

Keep the research question consistent

Compare SAGA with other companies selected by Price strength relative to volatility. A stronger overall score does not necessarily mean stronger evidence for this particular approach.

Open this screen →

Screen membership

Where SAGA qualifies

The same selection rules used by the Company Screener.

A traceable Sharemaestro report

Built from the record we have.

This report uses published Sharemaestro factor snapshots and stored completed weekly prices and indicators. Company inputs are translated into comparable standing, change and context. The page does not fetch live accounts or infer missing company results.

Scores use the established higher-is-stronger Sharemaestro display convention and are relative to United Kingdom - GBP / GBX. Sector medians compare those same universe scores; they do not re-rank the company. Peer medians exclude missing readings.

The company period is the period end used in the factor edition, not its filing date. Stored history is an observation record, not a claim of a point-in-time investable backtest. None of these scores is a probability or expected return.

Historical price series may reflect provider adjustments. The combined score is a summary, not a substitute for the distinct strengths, weaknesses and data coverage shown above.

Evidence context