87/100
-5.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 100% of 18 observed editionsGARP / KSL / Company ReportOpen chart terminal ↗
Sharemaestro company report · GARP · ASX
Kina Securities Limited
KSL · Growth with value support
0 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive. The company ranking and the current market picture disagree.
Factor edition2 Oct 2026
Weekly chart through2026-10-09
Company inputs through31 Dec 2025
Factor coverage73%
Latest completed factor comparison: 2 Oct 2026. Chart evidence is dated separately; price updates do not recalculate this factor edition.
The selected research question · GARP
Is the growth worth the valuation?
Growth is the starting point, value is the discipline and business strength is the cross-check. A company can pass the screen while its broader growth profile remains uneven.
Growth, price paid and business strength
Growth with value support
The screen’s growth test and the broader growth rank answer different questions. This company passes the saved GARP tests, but compare growth standing with value and business strength before relying on the overall score.
Latest change: 1 improving, 0 weakening and 3 unchanged across the 4 comparable focus pillars since the previous edition.
4/4 strong
Focus pillars with standing ≥65. This is a breadth check, not a new combined score.97/100
+6.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 100% of 18 observed editions84/100
-7.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 100% of 18 observed editions84/100
-2.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 67% of 18 observed editionsThe comparison uses companies qualifying for this screen in the same universe and edition. Medians require at least five companies. Historical strength counts actual factor observations; it does not claim historical screen membership.
01 · The company in perspective
The shape of the evidence
Current research reading
Value finding support
Value and business strength are joined by stronger price standing.
Check whether weekly trend and participation support the price ranking.
Strongest pillar
Value
97/100 standing
Weakest pillar
Business strength
84/100 standing
The strongest and weakest pillars describe this profile, not changes in company performance. The history below shows whether the readings are improving.
Beneath the factor profile
How well does the business support the score?
Cash value100/100
Cash backing71/100
Business durability78/100
Financial resilience100/100
Capital discipline58/100
Price support41/100
These established Sharemaestro cash-research scores summarise cash backing, durability, resilience and capital discipline. Higher is stronger on the available tests. They are separate from universe ranks and are not percentiles or probabilities. Missing components remain unavailable.
02 · Market confirmation
Is the price supporting the case?
Trend SignalNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Market DynamicsNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Relative StrengthNot positivelatest completed chart observation
Price / Fair Value+7.7%positive is above the reference
03 · What is changing
A strong reading matters more when it lasts.
Factor standing, one edition at a time
Read across for persistence. Read down for breadth. Each cell is an actual published observation.
80–9965–7940–640–39No reading
| Factor | 7 Jun2026 | 14 Jun2026 | 21 Jun2026 | 28 Jun2026 | 5 Jul2026 | 12 Jul2026 | 19 Jul2026 | 26 Jul2026 | 2 Aug2026 | 9 Aug2026 | 16 Aug2026 | 23 Aug2026 | 28 Aug2026 | 4 Sep2026 | 11 Sep2026 | 18 Sep2026 | 25 Sep2026 | 2 Oct2026 | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CombinedFocus | 96 | +11.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| GrowthFocus | 87 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| ValueFocus | 97 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| Business strengthFocus | 84 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price strengthFocus | 84 | +67.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital returnFurther context | 94 | 0.0points |
Hover or focus a cell to inspect its dated reading. Arrow keys move between factors and editions. Scroll across for more dates.
Changes since the previous edition
Price strength+67.0 pts17 → 84
Value0.0 pts97 → 97
Business strength0.0 pts84 → 84
Growth0.0 pts87 → 87
Capital return0.0 pts94 → 94
Changes compare 25 Sep 2026 with 2 Oct 2026. The underlying company period did not change between these editions. Prices, peer rankings and other inputs can still move the scores. Changes in a relative score do not, by themselves, identify a cause.
04 · Competitive position
Company strength, in its peer context
Growth and Value
KSL is highlighted against companies in the GARP screen. Select a point to compare the same research angle. Up to 250 companies shown.
Has price kept pace?
Price returns to 2 Oct 2026. The comparison is the median of companies in the same sector with a reading, not a traded portfolio.
3 monthsKSL-17.6%Sector median-3.3%Difference-14.3 pp
6 monthsKSL-9.7%Sector median-1.9%Difference-7.7 pp
12 monthsKSL-8.6%Sector median-8.4%Difference-0.2 pp
Relative standing is the useful comparison.
A rising share price can still trail its peers. A company with falling prices can still outperform a weaker sector. Compare the return gap with the factor profile before drawing a conclusion.
At least five sector observations are required to display a median. Returns exclude dividends. These are completed historical returns, not forward estimates.
05 · Staying power and price risk
Separate company standing from the ride.
Growth · strong editions100%score ≥65 in 18 observed editions
Annualised volatility15.7%stored one-year daily measure · factor date
Input coverage73%available factor inputs, not certainty
Drawdown measures the weekly close below its running high within the displayed price history. It starts at zero and is not an all-time drawdown. Persistence counts observed editions only; missing weeks are not filled in.
06 · Research playbook
What would strengthen — or weaken — this reading?
Growth improves without losing valuation support
Compare growth and value together across the next editions; use business strength and market support to challenge the conclusion.
0 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive. The company ranking and the current market picture disagree.
Growth fades or value weakens without stronger evidence
Business strength is the weakest measured focus pillar at 84/100. Check whether it is recovering, stable or deteriorating in the history above.
A loss of screen qualification, lower coverage or deterioration across several readings would require a fresh review.
Keep the research question consistent
Compare KSL with other companies selected by GARP. A stronger overall score does not necessarily mean stronger evidence for this particular approach.
Open this screen →Screen membership
Where KSL qualifies
A traceable Sharemaestro report
Built from the record we have.
This report uses published Sharemaestro factor snapshots and stored completed weekly prices and indicators. Company inputs are translated into comparable standing, change and context. The page does not fetch live accounts or infer missing company results.
Scores use the established higher-is-stronger Sharemaestro display convention and are relative to Australia - AUD. Sector medians compare those same universe scores; they do not re-rank the company. Peer medians exclude missing readings.
The company period is the period end used in the factor edition, not its filing date. Stored history is an observation record, not a claim of a point-in-time investable backtest. None of these scores is a probability or expected return.
Historical price series may reflect provider adjustments. The combined score is a summary, not a substitute for the distinct strengths, weaknesses and data coverage shown above.