-63.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 11% of 18 observed editionsSharemaestro company report · Price leaders · ASX
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited
RG1 · Leadership needs a confirmation check
2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.
Latest completed factor comparison: 2 Oct 2026. Chart evidence is dated separately; price updates do not recalculate this factor edition.
The selected research question · Price leaders
Is price leadership durable?
The focus is sustained price strength with a volatility limit. Check leadership across horizons, current market agreement and the depth of setbacks.
Leadership, persistence and the ride
Leadership needs a confirmation check
2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive. Compare that latest chart evidence with the older price-strength rank and the actual return path.
Latest change: 0 improving, 1 weakening and 2 unchanged across the 3 comparable focus pillars since the previous edition.
-41.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 11% of 18 observed editions+15.0 points vs screen median
Strong in 11% of 18 observed editionsThe comparison uses companies qualifying for this screen in the same universe and edition. Medians require at least five companies. Historical strength counts actual factor observations; it does not claim historical screen membership.
01 · The company in perspective
The shape of the evidence
Current research reading
A selective picture
The factor profile contains a mix of stronger and weaker readings.
Start with the strongest pillar and test the weakest part of the case.
Growth
32/100 standing
Business strength
30/100 standing
The strongest and weakest pillars describe this profile, not changes in company performance. The history below shows whether the readings are improving.
Beneath the factor profile
How well does the business support the score?
These established Sharemaestro cash-research scores summarise cash backing, durability, resilience and capital discipline. Higher is stronger on the available tests. They are separate from universe ranks and are not percentiles or probabilities. Missing components remain unavailable.
02 · The centre of the research case
Is the price supporting the case?
03 · What is changing
A strong reading matters more when it lasts.
Read across for persistence. Read down for breadth. Each cell is an actual published observation.
| Factor | 7 Jun2026 | 14 Jun2026 | 21 Jun2026 | 28 Jun2026 | 5 Jul2026 | 12 Jul2026 | 19 Jul2026 | 26 Jul2026 | 2 Aug2026 | 9 Aug2026 | 16 Aug2026 | 23 Aug2026 | 28 Aug2026 | 4 Sep2026 | 11 Sep2026 | 18 Sep2026 | 25 Sep2026 | 2 Oct2026 | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CombinedFocus | 24 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price strengthFocus | 30 | -1.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| Business strengthFocus | 30 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| ValueFocus | 31 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| GrowthFurther context | 32 | 0.0points | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital returnFurther context | 32 | -1.0points |
Hover or focus a cell to inspect its dated reading. Arrow keys move between factors and editions. Scroll across for more dates.
Changes since the previous edition
Changes compare 25 Sep 2026 with 2 Oct 2026. The underlying company period did not change between these editions. Prices, peer rankings and other inputs can still move the scores. Changes in a relative score do not, by themselves, identify a cause.
04 · Competitive position
Company strength, in its peer context
Price strength and Business strength
RG1 is highlighted against companies in the Price leaders screen. Select a point to compare the same research angle. Up to 250 companies shown.
Has price kept pace?
Price returns to 2 Oct 2026. The comparison is the median of companies in the same sector with a reading, not a traded portfolio.
Relative standing is the useful comparison.
A rising share price can still trail its peers. A company with falling prices can still outperform a weaker sector. Compare the return gap with the factor profile before drawing a conclusion.
At least five sector observations are required to display a median. Returns exclude dividends. These are completed historical returns, not forward estimates.
05 · Staying power and price risk
Separate company standing from the ride.
Drawdown measures the weekly close below its running high within the displayed price history. It starts at zero and is not an all-time drawdown. Persistence counts observed editions only; missing weeks are not filled in.
06 · Research playbook
What would strengthen — or weaken — this reading?
Price leadership keeps its market support
Track relative returns across three, six and twelve months, then open Trend Persistence to examine durability.
2 of 3 available weekly market readings are positive.
Relative performance fades and setbacks deepen
Price strength is the weakest measured focus pillar at 30/100. Check whether it is recovering, stable or deteriorating in the history above.
A loss of screen qualification, lower coverage or deterioration across several readings would require a fresh review.
Keep the research question consistent
Compare RG1 with other companies selected by Price leaders. A stronger overall score does not necessarily mean stronger evidence for this particular approach.
Open this screen →Screen membership
Where RG1 qualifies
A traceable Sharemaestro report
Built from the record we have.
This report uses published Sharemaestro factor snapshots and stored completed weekly prices and indicators. Company inputs are translated into comparable standing, change and context. The page does not fetch live accounts or infer missing company results.
Scores use the established higher-is-stronger Sharemaestro display convention and are relative to Australia - AUD. Sector medians compare those same universe scores; they do not re-rank the company. Peer medians exclude missing readings.
The company period is the period end used in the factor edition, not its filing date. Stored history is an observation record, not a claim of a point-in-time investable backtest. None of these scores is a probability or expected return.
Historical price series may reflect provider adjustments. The combined score is a summary, not a substitute for the distinct strengths, weaknesses and data coverage shown above.