MATH

Understanding the chart

What Market Dynamics shows

Market Dynamics shows whether the support beneath a completed price move is strengthening or weakening. Green bars are supportive, red bars are cautious, and the height of each bar shows how forceful the finished reading is.

Read price and the bars together

When price and Market Dynamics strengthen together, the move has broader confirmation. When price rises while Market Dynamics fades, the move is losing support and risk can be building near the upper zone. When price remains weak while Market Dynamics begins to improve, an opportunity may be forming near the lower zone before price has fully responded.

Zones and event markers

The upper and lower zones highlight completed periods where price and underlying support deserve closer attention. Early positioning signals mark improving support near the lower part of the chart. Reversal risk and reversal danger markers highlight increasing disagreement near the upper part. They are observations to investigate, not automatic instructions.

Use the explainer when needed

Turn on Explainer above the chart to label the published event markers. The labels point to the exact completed week and remain off by default so the full chart stays uncluttered.

What it does not show

Market Dynamics is not a forecast, price target or standalone buy or sell signal. Divergence can persist, so the reading should be considered with price structure, trend and the wider research view.

Reading price beside support

The recent price and Market Dynamics relationship

The chart rebases price to the first close in the 12-week view and compares it with the completed Market Dynamics reading. The shaded area draws attention to the latest 4 completed weeks without discarding the earlier context.

Positive divergence

When price remains below its recent baseline or in the lower part of its stored range while Market Dynamics improves, support may be developing before price responds. It becomes stronger evidence only if price subsequently confirms it.

Negative divergence

When price remains elevated while Market Dynamics is weak or deteriorating, price is running ahead of its support. The gap can close through consolidation, weaker price, or renewed improvement in Market Dynamics; an immediate reversal is not assumed.

What it means for MATH

Market Dynamics is improving ahead of price. This is constructive divergence, not a completed price signal. Watch for price to turn higher while Market Dynamics holds or improves; if support fades first, the divergence has not converted into confirmation.

Understanding the transition

The zone-to-zone journey

This view asks whether MATH is moving from a confirmed source zone toward the opposite zone. An upward journey runs from accumulation to distribution; the reverse journey runs from distribution to accumulation.

What it means for MATH

No active exit is being measured. The model is waiting for price to leave a confirmed source zone before starting another journey.

Why zone confirmation matters

Time inside a zone separates a brief touch from a more established state. A deeper close can confirm residence sooner; otherwise consecutive completed closes are required.

Reading position and dwell

Where price is in the current journey

Zone-span position normalises the distance from the source-zone boundary to the target-zone boundary. Zero is the source side and 100% is the target side, regardless of whether the journey is upward or downward.

MATH is % across its current no active journey span after 0 completed weeks.

What this is not

Position is not the probability of success, a percentage price return or a price target. It only describes location between the current point-in-time zone boundaries.

Understanding the percentages

Completion and invalidation probability

Completion means the target zone is confirmed before the source zone is reconfirmed. Invalidation means price returns far enough, for long enough, to reconfirm the source zone first.

Current reading for MATH

The model currently assigns % within 12 weeks, % within 26 weeks and % within 52 weeks. The probability of reconfirming the source first within 52 weeks is %.

Why a number can be only 1%

A low completion reading does not mean there is a 1% chance the price rises next week. It means the current combination of path position, age, zone dwell and completed support evidence resembles relatively few historical states that confirmed the target within that horizon before returning to source.

Why the figures may not total 100%

The remainder covers journeys that could remain unresolved beyond the stated horizon. The figures are horizon-specific competing outcomes, not a directional vote on the next completed week.

Reading the transition chart

Where the active journey has travelled

This chart answers one question only: how far has the observed completed-week price path moved from its confirmed starting zone toward the opposite zone?

Zero is the source side and 100% is the opposite target side. The definition is reversed automatically for a distribution-to-accumulation journey, so higher chart values always mean further progress toward the current target.

What it does not show

The line is an observed normalised price position, not a probability and not a forecast. Touching 100% is also not enough on its own: the target zone still requires the stated completed-week confirmation.

Observed ticker history

How earlier transitions resolved

MATH has 2 completed opposite-zone journeys across the latest 156 charted weeks.

What is included

Each visible green path answers one clear question: how did price travel from a confirmed source-zone exit to a confirmed opposite zone? Incomplete journeys and returns to the starting zone are not displayed here.

How to use it

Direction shows whether each successful journey ran from accumulation to distribution or in reverse. Source dwell shows how established the starting state was; time to confirm measures the completed weeks from exit to confirmation; price move describes the observed move over that same interval.

Important limitation

The historical paths use the fixed zones drawn on the current chart, so they are descriptive and visually checkable rather than a point-in-time backtest. The price move is not a trading-strategy return, and the completed examples are not independent model validation.

Latest completed-week context

Evidence influencing the current reading

Market Dynamics describes the latest underlying support reading. 12-week change shows whether that support has strengthened or weakened across the recent completed path.

Trend position % places the close relative to the Trend Line. Volume ratio × compares recent completed participation with its established baseline.

Significance for MATH

These readings help distinguish a price move supported by trend and participation from one that is weakening, stalling or reversing. No single reading determines the journey outcome by itself.